Chen Ting, Dai Yi-Jun, Ding Juan-Fang, Yuan Sheng, Ni Jue-Ping
Nanjing Engineering and Biotechnology Research Center for Microbiology, Jiangsu Key Lab for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, P.R. China.
Biodegradation. 2008 Sep;19(5):651-8. doi: 10.1007/s10532-007-9170-2. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
Our previous study found that Stenotrophomonas maltophilia CGMCC 1.1788 could hydroxylate imidacloprid (IMI) to 5-hydroxy IMI. Here we first report that S. maltophilia CGMCC 1.1788 can demethylate acetamiprid (AAP) to form IM 2-1 that was characterized by HPLC-MS/MS and NMR. IM 2-1 retained only 10.5% contact activity and 13.1% oral activity of AAP against horsebean aphid. Time course of biotransformation under existing of sucrose revealed that 58.9% of AAP disappeared, but only 16.7% of reduced AAP was transformed to IM 2-1, after 8 days. Both demethylation and degradation of AAP contribute to the weak bioefficacy of AAP in soil application. The differences in metabolism and detoxification pathways between AAP and IMI are probably originated from the structural differences of these insecticides.
我们之前的研究发现,嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌CGMCC 1.1788可将吡虫啉(IMI)羟基化为5-羟基IMI。在此我们首次报道,嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌CGMCC 1.1788可将啶虫脒(AAP)去甲基化形成IM 2-1,通过HPLC-MS/MS和NMR对其进行了表征。IM 2-1对蚕豆蚜的触杀活性仅保留了AAP的10.5%,胃毒活性仅保留了13.1%。在蔗糖存在下的生物转化时间进程显示,8天后,58.9%的AAP消失,但只有16.7%还原的AAP转化为IM 2-1。AAP的去甲基化和降解都导致了AAP在土壤施用中的生物活性较弱。AAP和IMI在代谢和解毒途径上的差异可能源于这些杀虫剂的结构差异。