Suppr超能文献

药物洗脱支架置入术后西洛他唑与氯吡格雷在糖尿病患者中的随机对照研究——药物洗脱支架治疗糖尿病患者的西洛他唑(CIDES)试验

Randomized comparison of cilostazol vs clopidogrel after drug-eluting stenting in diabetic patients--clilostazol for diabetic patients in drug-eluting stent (CIDES) trial.

作者信息

Ahn Youngkeun, Jeong Myung Ho, Jeong Jong Weon, Kim Kye Hun, Ahn Tae Hoon, Kang Woong Chul, Park Chang-Gyu, Kim Jong Hyun, Chae In-Ho, Nam Chang Wook, Hur Seung-Ho, Bae Jang-Ho, Kim Ki Young, Oh Seok Kyu

机构信息

Heart Center, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea.

出版信息

Circ J. 2008 Jan;72(1):35-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.72.35.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that cilostazol may not only prevent stent thrombosis, but may also have positive effect in the prevention of restenosis. However, the effect of cilostazol on restenosis after successful deployment of drug-eluting stent (DES) in patients with diabetes mellitus has not been evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 280 patients at 8 clinical sites were randomized. The patients (61.7+/-9.9 years old, 163 males) who underwent successful stenting were randomized to aspirin and cilostazol (group I, n=141, 61.2+/-9.6 years old) vs aspirin and clopidogrel (group II, n=139, 62.0+/-10.0 years old) after 1 month of aspirin, cilostazol, and clopidogrel combination treatment. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics of the groups. The type of DES implanted did not differ between the groups. There were no differences in angiographic and procedural characteristics of the groups. Major adverse cardiac events, including acute and subacute stent thrombosis within 1 month, did not occur in either group. Cases of angiographic late stent thrombosis were 1 (0.9%) in group I and 1 (0.8%) in group II. Follow-up coronary angiography was performed in 237 patients (84.6%). Mean follow-up duration was 7.1 months. The rate of angiographic restenosis (stent plus 5-mm borders) was 9 (8.0%) in group I and 20 (16.1%) in group II, p=0.041). The minimal luminal diameter at follow-up period in group I was 2.55+/-0.63 mm compared with 2.41+/-0.83 mm in group II (p=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with aspirin and cilostazol for the prevention of stent restenosis is comparable or superior to that of aspirin and clopidogrel in diabetic patients who undergo DES implantation.

摘要

背景

既往研究表明,西洛他唑不仅可预防支架内血栓形成,还可能对预防再狭窄有积极作用。然而,西洛他唑对糖尿病患者成功植入药物洗脱支架(DES)后再狭窄的影响尚未得到评估。

方法与结果

8个临床中心的280例患者被随机分组。成功置入支架的患者(61.7±9.9岁,男性163例)在接受1个月的阿司匹林、西洛他唑和氯吡格雷联合治疗后,被随机分为阿司匹林加西洛他唑组(I组,n = 141,61.2±9.6岁)和阿司匹林加氯吡格雷组(II组,n = 139,62.0±10.0岁)。两组的基线特征无显著差异。两组植入的DES类型无差异。两组的血管造影和手术特征无差异。两组均未发生主要不良心脏事件,包括1个月内的急性和亚急性支架内血栓形成。I组血管造影晚期支架内血栓形成病例为1例(0.9%),II组为1例(0.8%)。237例患者(84.6%)接受了随访冠状动脉造影。平均随访时间为7.1个月。I组血管造影再狭窄率(支架加5 mm边界)为9例(8.0%),II组为20例(16.1%),p = 0.041)。I组随访期最小管腔直径为2.55±0.63 mm,II组为2.41±0.83 mm(p = 无显著性差异)。

结论

在接受DES植入的糖尿病患者中,阿司匹林联合西洛他唑预防支架再狭窄的疗效与阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷相当或更优。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验