Bangalore Sripal, Singh Amita, Toklu Bora, DiNicolantonio James J, Croce Kevin, Feit Frederick, Bhatt Deepak L
New York University School of Medicine , New York, New York , USA.
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
Open Heart. 2014 Aug 7;1(1):e000068. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000068. eCollection 2014.
Cilostazol overcomes high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) and reduces adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the role for triple antiplatelet therapy (TAPT) with cilostazol in addition to aspirin and clopidogrel after PCI is not well defined.
We conducted a MEDLINE/EMBASE/CENTRAL search for randomised trials, until May 2014, evaluating TAPT compared with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) of aspirin and clopidogrel alone in patients undergoing PCI and reporting platelet reactivity and/or CV outcomes. The primary platelet reactivity outcome was differences in platelet reactivity unit (PRU) with secondary outcomes of %platelet inhibition and rate of HTPR. The primary CV outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), with secondary outcomes of death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis (ST), target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and target vessel revascularisation (TVR) as well as safety outcomes of bleeding and drug discontinuations.
In 17 trials that evaluated platelet reactivity outcomes, the mean PRU value was 47.73 units lower with TAPT versus DAPT (95% CI -61.41 to -34.04, p<0.0001; mean PRU 182.90 vs 232.65). TAPT also increased platelet inhibition by 12.71% (95% CI 10.76 to 14.67, p<0.0001), and led to a 60% reduction in the risk of HTPR (relative risk=0.40; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.53) compared with DAPT. Moreover, among the 34 trials that evaluated CV outcomes, TAPT reduced the risk of MACE (incident rate ratio (IRR)=0.68; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.78), TLR (IRR=0.57; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.73), TVR (IRR=0.69; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.81) and ST (IRR=0.63; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.98) with no difference for other outcomes including bleeding, even in trials using drug-eluting stents. Drug discontinuation due to adverse effects was, however, higher with TAPT vs DAPT (IRR=1.59; 95% CI 1.32 to 1.91).
In patients undergoing PCI, addition of cilostazol to DAPT results in decreased platelet reactivity and a significant reduction in CV outcomes including ST, even in the drug-eluting stent era.
西洛他唑可克服治疗期间的高血小板反应性(HTPR),并降低经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的不良心血管(CV)结局。然而,PCI术后在阿司匹林和氯吡格雷基础上加用西洛他唑的三联抗血小板治疗(TAPT)的作用尚不明确。
我们在MEDLINE/EMBASE/CENTRAL数据库中检索截至2014年5月的随机试验,这些试验评估了PCI患者中TAPT与单独使用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)相比的情况,并报告了血小板反应性和/或CV结局。主要血小板反应性结局是血小板反应性单位(PRU)的差异,次要结局为血小板抑制百分比和HTPR发生率。主要CV结局是主要不良心血管事件(MACE),次要结局包括死亡、心血管死亡、心肌梗死、支架血栓形成(ST)、靶病变血运重建(TLR)和靶血管血运重建(TVR),以及出血和药物停用等安全性结局。
在17项评估血小板反应性结局的试验中,与DAPT相比,TAPT的平均PRU值低47.73个单位(95%CI -61.41至-34.04,p<0.0001;平均PRU分别为182.90和232.65)。TAPT还使血小板抑制增加了12.71%(95%CI 10.76至14.67,p<0.0001),与DAPT相比,HTPR风险降低了60%(相对风险=0.40;95%CI 0.30至0.53)。此外,在34项评估CV结局的试验中,TAPT降低了MACE(发生率比(IRR)=0.68;95%CI 0.60至0.78)、TLR(IRR=0.57;95%CI 0.44至0.73)、TVR(IRR=0.69;95%CI 0.59至0.81)和ST(IRR=0.63;95%CI 0.40至0.98)的风险,其他结局包括出血方面无差异,即使在使用药物洗脱支架的试验中也是如此。然而,与DAPT相比,TAPT因不良反应导致的药物停用率更高(IRR=1.59;95%CI 1.3至1.91)。
在接受PCI的患者中,即使在药物洗脱支架时代,在DAPT基础上加用西洛他唑也可降低血小板反应性,并显著降低包括ST在内的CV结局。