Suppr超能文献

因社区获得性肺炎从急诊出院的门诊患者的血培养情况。

Blood cultures in ambulatory patients who are discharged from emergency with community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Marrie Thomas J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.

出版信息

Can J Infect Dis. 2004 Jan;15(1):21-4. doi: 10.1155/2004/530645.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the factors that predict whether or not ambulatory patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treated in an emergency room (ER) setting will have blood cultures drawn and the factors that predict a positive blood culture.

METHODS

Prospective observational study of all patients with a diagnosis of CAP, as made by an ER physician, who presented to any of seven Edmonton-area ERs over a two-year period.

RESULTS

Seven hundred ninety-three (19.2%) of 4124 patients with CAP had blood cultures drawn. The site-specific blood culture rates ranged from 7.8% to 25% (P<0.001); 41 of 793 (5.1%) were positive. Streptococcus pneumoniae accounted for 58.5% of the isolates while Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli each accounted for 14.6%, or six patients each. Only two of the 24 patients with S pneumoniae bacteremia were subsequently admitted to hospital while all six of the patients with S aureus were admitted. Only one of the six patients with E coli bacteremia was treated at home. No factors were predictive of positive blood cultures on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians are selective in ordering blood cultures on patients with ambulatory pneumonia who present to an ER, and the positivity rate of 5.1% is quite high. No factors are predictive of positive blood cultures on multivariate analysis, thus clinical judgment has to prevail in the decision to perform blood cultures. Breakthrough bacteremia can occur with microorganisms susceptible to the antibiotics that the patient is receiving.

摘要

目的

确定预测在急诊室接受治疗的社区获得性肺炎(CAP)门诊患者是否进行血培养的因素,以及预测血培养阳性的因素。

方法

对两年期间在埃德蒙顿地区七家急诊室就诊的所有被急诊医生诊断为CAP的患者进行前瞻性观察研究。

结果

4124例CAP患者中有793例(19.2%)进行了血培养。各医院的血培养率从7.8%到25%不等(P<0.001);793例中有41例(5.1%)血培养阳性。肺炎链球菌占分离菌的58.5%,金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠埃希菌各占14.6%,各有6例患者。24例肺炎链球菌菌血症患者中只有2例随后住院,而6例金黄色葡萄球菌患者全部住院。6例大肠埃希菌菌血症患者中只有1例在家接受治疗。多因素分析中没有因素可预测血培养阳性。

结论

医生对到急诊室就诊的门诊肺炎患者进行血培养时具有选择性,5.1%的阳性率相当高。多因素分析中没有因素可预测血培养阳性,因此在决定是否进行血培养时必须以临床判断为主。对于患者正在接受的抗生素敏感的微生物可发生突破性菌血症。

相似文献

10
Blood cultures in the emergency department evaluation of childhood pneumonia.急诊科儿童肺炎血培养评估。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011 Jun;30(6):475-9. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31820a5adb.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验