Colzani Mara, Schütz Frédéric, Potts Alexandra, Waridel Patrice, Quadroni Manfredo
Center for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, Quartier Sorge, 1015 Lausanne-Dorigny, Switzerland.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008 May;7(5):927-37. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700440-MCP200. Epub 2007 Dec 28.
Metabolic labeling techniques have recently become popular tools for the quantitative profiling of proteomes. Classical stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell cultures (SILAC) uses pairs of heavy/light isotopic forms of amino acids to introduce predictable mass differences in protein samples to be compared. After proteolysis, pairs of cognate precursor peptides can be correlated, and their intensities can be used for mass spectrometry-based relative protein quantification. We present an alternative SILAC approach by which two cell cultures are grown in media containing isobaric forms of amino acids, labeled either with 13C on the carbonyl (C-1) carbon or 15N on backbone nitrogen. Labeled peptides from both samples have the same nominal mass and nearly identical MS/MS spectra but generate upon fragmentation distinct immonium ions separated by 1 amu. When labeled protein samples are mixed, the intensities of these immonium ions can be used for the relative quantification of the parent proteins. We validated the labeling of cellular proteins with valine, isoleucine, and leucine with coverage of 97% of all tryptic peptides. We improved the sensitivity for the detection of the quantification ions on a pulsing instrument by using a specific fast scan event. The analysis of a protein mixture with a known heavy/light ratio showed reliable quantification. Finally the application of the technique to the analysis of two melanoma cell lines yielded quantitative data consistent with those obtained by a classical two-dimensional DIGE analysis of the same samples. Our method combines the features of the SILAC technique with the advantages of isobaric labeling schemes like iTRAQ. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of isobaric SILAC with immonium ion splitting as well as possible ways to improve it.
代谢标记技术最近已成为蛋白质组定量分析的常用工具。经典的细胞培养中氨基酸稳定同位素标记法(SILAC)使用重/轻同位素形式的氨基酸对,在待比较的蛋白质样品中引入可预测的质量差异。蛋白水解后,同源前体肽对可相互关联,其强度可用于基于质谱的相对蛋白质定量。我们提出了一种替代的SILAC方法,其中两种细胞培养物在含有等压形式氨基酸的培养基中生长,这些氨基酸要么在羰基(C-1)碳上用13C标记,要么在主链氮上用15N标记。来自两个样品的标记肽具有相同的标称质量和几乎相同的MS/MS谱,但在碎片化时会产生相差1 amu的不同亚铵离子。当混合标记的蛋白质样品时,这些亚铵离子的强度可用于母体蛋白质的相对定量。我们用缬氨酸、异亮氨酸和亮氨酸验证了细胞蛋白的标记,胰蛋白酶肽的覆盖率达97%。通过使用特定的快速扫描事件,我们提高了在脉冲仪器上检测定量离子的灵敏度。对具有已知重/轻比的蛋白质混合物的分析显示出可靠的定量结果。最后,将该技术应用于两种黑色素瘤细胞系的分析,得到的定量数据与对相同样品进行经典二维DIGE分析所获得的数据一致。我们的方法结合了SILAC技术的特点和等压标记方案(如iTRAQ)的优点。我们讨论了具有亚铵离子分裂的等压SILAC的优缺点以及改进它的可能方法。