Lubell Yoel, Reyburn Hugh, Mbakilwa Hilda, Mwangi Rose, Chonya Kini, Whitty Christopher J M, Mills Anne
Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Dec;77(6 Suppl):128-32.
The introduction of artemisinin-based combination therapy in sub-Saharan Africa has prompted calls for increased use of parasitologic diagnosis for malaria. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) in comparison to microscopy in guiding treatment of non-severe febrile illness at varying levels of malaria endemicity using data on test accuracy and costs collected as part of a Tanzanian trial. If prescribers complied with current guidelines, microscopy would give rise to lower average costs per patient correctly treated than RDTs in areas of both high and low transmission. RDT introduction would result in an additional 2.3% and 9.4% of patients correctly treated, at an incremental cost of $25 and $7 in the low and high transmission settings, respectively. Cost-effectiveness would be worse if prescribers do not comply with test results. The cost of this additional benefit may be higher than many countries can afford without external assistance or lower RDT prices.
在撒哈拉以南非洲引入以青蒿素为基础的联合疗法,促使人们呼吁增加疟疾寄生虫学诊断的使用。我们利用在坦桑尼亚一项试验中收集的检测准确性和成本数据,评估了快速诊断检测(RDT)与显微镜检查相比,在不同疟疾流行程度下指导非重症发热疾病治疗的成本效益。如果开处方者遵守现行指南,在高传播和低传播地区,显微镜检查每正确治疗一名患者的平均成本将低于RDT。引入RDT将使正确治疗的患者额外增加2.3%和9.4%,在低传播和高传播环境下,增量成本分别为25美元和7美元。如果开处方者不遵守检测结果,成本效益会更差。这种额外效益的成本可能高于许多国家在没有外部援助或RDT价格降低的情况下所能承受的水平。