Chang Edward C, Ivezaj Valentina, Downey Christina A, Kashima Yuri, Morady Aviva R
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Eat Behav. 2008 Jan;9(1):102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Jun 20.
The present study investigated the relationships between three popular measures of perfectionism [the Eating Disorders Inventory - Perfectionism scale (EDI-P), the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS), and the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS)] and measures of eating disturbances and health behaviors, in a sample of 248 female college students. Results indicated that the adaptiveness or maladaptiveness of certain perfectionism dimensions should still be questioned. Also, self-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism (from the MPS) were consistently found to be the most important predictors of both eating disturbances and health behaviors. Surprisingly, scores on the EDI-P were not found to be significant predictors of eating disturbances when FMPS and MPS scores were included in regression analyses. Implications of the present findings are discussed.
本研究在248名女大学生样本中，调查了三种流行的完美主义测量方法[饮食失调量表-完美主义量表（EDI-P）、弗罗斯特多维完美主义量表（FMPS）和多维完美主义量表（MPS）]与饮食紊乱测量方法及健康行为之间的关系。结果表明，某些完美主义维度的适应性或非适应性仍值得质疑。此外，一直以来发现，自我导向型和社会规定型完美主义（来自MPS）是饮食紊乱和健康行为最重要的预测因素。令人惊讶的是，当FMPS和MPS分数纳入回归分析时，未发现EDI-P分数是饮食紊乱的显著预测因素。本文讨论了这些研究结果的意义。
