Rugge Massimo, Fassan Matteo, Clemente Roberto, Rizzardi Giovanna, Giacomelli Luciano, Pennelli Gianmaria, Mescoli Claudia, Segat Daniela, Rea Federico
Department of Medical Diagnostic Sciences and Special Therapies, University of Padova, Italy.
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jan 1;14(1):149-54. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1631.
The histologic distinction between low-grade typical and intermediate-grade atypical bronchopulmonary carcinoids basically lies on cellular differentiation, mitotic activity, and presence of "neoplastic" necrosis; at single patient level, however, none of these features enables a reliable prediction of the clinicopathologic outcome.
The long-term postsurgical outcome of a single-institution series of 67 radically treated bronchopulmonary carcinoids was correlated with the tumor phenotype assessed by combining conventional histology with a panel of immunohistochemical markers exploring cell differentiation (chromogranin, NSE, TTF1), cell turnover (Mib1), and apoptosis (Bcl2, Bax).
Fifty-eight (86.6%) carcinoids were assessed as low-grade typical and nine (13.4%) were assessed as intermediate-grade atypical. The mean follow-up was of 85.13 months (range, 28-168; median, 82.0). All cases expressed neuroendocrine markers, whereas TTF1 was never expressed. At univariate analysis, tumor recurrence (n = 6) correlated significantly with the carcinoid histotype (P = 0.002) and with each of the following variables: tumor location (P = 0.01), mitotic index (P = 0.003), necrosis (P = 0.002), tumor vascular invasion (P = 0.0001), Mib1 expression (P = 0.005), Bcl2 expression (P = 0.024), and synchronous node metastasis (P = 0.028). The best cutoffs for Mib1 and Bcl2 expression (calculated by receiver operating characteristic curves) discriminating recurrent versus nonrecurrent tumors were 5.4% for Mib1 and 2.0% for Bcl2 (Mib1: sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 97%; area under curve, 0.844 +/- 0.14; Bcl2: sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 65%; area under curve, 0.769 +/- 0.12). By stratifying the patients according to the obtained cutoffs, significant differences emerged in the patients' disease-free survival (log-rank test: Mib1, P = 0.0001; Bcl2, P = 0.01).
Mib1 and Bcl2 significantly discriminate between recurrent versus nonrecurrent tumors, producing a biologically plausible, diagnostically suitable immunohistochemical pattern.
低级别典型类癌和中级别非典型支气管肺类癌的组织学差异主要在于细胞分化、有丝分裂活性以及“肿瘤性”坏死的存在;然而,在单个患者层面,这些特征均无法可靠预测临床病理结果。
对一家机构的67例接受根治性治疗的支气管肺类癌患者的长期术后结果,与通过将传统组织学与一组免疫组化标志物相结合所评估的肿瘤表型进行关联分析,这些标志物用于探究细胞分化(嗜铬粒蛋白、神经元特异性烯醇化酶、甲状腺转录因子1)、细胞更新(Mib1)以及细胞凋亡(Bcl2、Bax)。
58例(86.6%)类癌被评估为低级别典型类癌,9例(13.4%)被评估为中级别非典型类癌。平均随访时间为85.13个月(范围28 - 168个月;中位数82.0个月)。所有病例均表达神经内分泌标志物,而甲状腺转录因子1从未表达。单因素分析显示,肿瘤复发(n = 6)与类癌组织学类型显著相关(P = 0.002),并与以下每个变量相关:肿瘤位置(P = 0.01)、有丝分裂指数(P = 0.003)、坏死(P = 0.002)、肿瘤血管侵犯(P = 0.0001)、Mib1表达(P = 0.005)、Bcl2表达(P = 0.024)以及同步淋巴结转移(P = 0.028)。通过受试者工作特征曲线计算得出的区分复发与未复发肿瘤的Mib1和Bcl2表达的最佳临界值分别为:Mib1为5.4%,Bcl2为2.0%(Mib1:敏感性83%;特异性97%;曲线下面积0.844±0.14;Bcl2:敏感性83%;特异性65%;曲线下面积0.769±0.12)。根据所得临界值对患者进行分层后,患者的无病生存期出现显著差异(对数秩检验:Mib1,P = 0.0001;Bcl2,P = 0.01)。
Mib1和Bcl2在复发与未复发肿瘤之间有显著区分,产生了生物学上合理、诊断上适用的免疫组化模式。