Deng Gang, Ashley Alyssa J, Brown William E, Eaton Joseph W, Hauck Walter W, Kikwai Loice C, Liddell Mark R, Manning Ronald G, Munoz Jimmy M, Nithyanandan Pallavi, Glasgow Maria J, Stippler Erika, Wahab Samir Z, Williams Roger L
United States Pharmacopeia, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Pharm Res. 2008 May;25(5):1100-9. doi: 10.1007/s11095-007-9498-7. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
Beyond instrumental qualification, proficiency testing is not usually a prerequisite for many analytical procedures, given reliance on a manufacturer's assay validation coupled with regulatory review and inspection. Given the special features of the dissolution procedure, proficiency testing was put in place initially by pharmaceutical manufacturers and carried on by USP. Proficiency testing is designed to help ensure that execution of a dissolution procedure for solid oral dosage forms adequately supports administrative and legal decisions so that measurements made at different times, by different analysts, or with different methods can be confidently compared. USP has applied metrological principles to aid practitioners in carrying out the dissolution procedure alone and in collaborative studies to facilitate understanding potential sources of variability.
The present study aimed to identify key dissolution variables associated with USP Lot P Prednisone Tablets in conjunction with the USP Performance Verification Test (PVT). Using five dissolution test assemblies from different manufacturers, at least four of six analysts determined percents prednisone dissolved on dissolution Apparatus 1 (basket) and Apparatus 2 (paddle) on each assembly. Six replicate experiments were performed on each analyst-assembly combination with a set of six to eight tablets in each experiment.
Statistical analysis demonstrated that dissolution test assemblies were the largest factor contributing to dissolution variability. Inherent tablet variability was low, and USP Lot P Prednisone Tablets did not contribute importantly to dissolution variability. Contributions from analyst and analytical procedure also were estimated to be low.
除仪器鉴定外,鉴于依赖制造商的分析方法验证以及监管审查和检查,能力验证通常不是许多分析程序的先决条件。鉴于溶出度测定程序的特殊性,能力验证最初由制药商实施,后由美国药典(USP)继续开展。能力验证旨在帮助确保固体口服制剂溶出度测定程序的执行能充分支持管理和法律决策,以便能够可靠地比较不同时间、不同分析人员或不同方法所进行的测量。USP应用计量学原理,帮助从业人员单独进行溶出度测定程序以及开展协作研究,以促进了解变异性的潜在来源。
本研究旨在结合USP性能验证试验(PVT),确定与USP P批泼尼松片相关的关键溶出变量。使用来自不同制造商的五个溶出度测试装置,六名分析人员中至少有四名测定了每个装置在溶出度仪1(篮法)和溶出度仪2(桨法)上泼尼松的溶出百分比。对每个分析人员与装置的组合进行六次重复实验,每次实验使用六至八片药片。
统计分析表明,溶出度测试装置是导致溶出度变异性的最大因素。片剂本身的变异性较低,USP P批泼尼松片对溶出度变异性的影响不大。分析人员和分析程序的影响估计也较小。