Suppr超能文献

使用纳米晶羟基磷灰石或天然骨矿物质联合胶原膜治疗种植体周围炎病变后的两年临床结果。

Two-year clinical results following treatment of peri-implantitis lesions using a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite or a natural bone mineral in combination with a collagen membrane.

作者信息

Schwarz Frank, Sculean Anton, Bieling Katrin, Ferrari Daniel, Rothamel Daniel, Becker Jürgen

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery, Westdeutsche Kieferklinik, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Jan;35(1):80-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01168.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present case series was to evaluate the 2-year results obtained following treatment of peri-implantitis lesions using either a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (NHA) or a natural bone mineral in combination with a collagen membrane (NBM+CM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients suffering from moderate peri-implantitis (n=22 intra-bony defects) were randomly treated with (i) access flap surgery (AFS) and the application of NHA, or with AFS and the application of NBM+CM. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline and after 12, 18, and 24 months of non-submerged healing.

RESULTS

Two patients from the NHA group were excluded from the study due to severe pus formation at 12 months. At 24 months, both groups revealed clinically important probing depth (PD) reductions (NHA: 1.5+/-0.6 mm; NBM+CM: 2.4+/-0.8 mm) and clinical attachment level (CAL) gains (NHA: 1.0+/-0.4 mm; NBM+CM: 2.0+/-0.8 mm). However, these clinical improvements seemed to be better in the NBM+CM group (difference between groups: PD reduction: 0.9+/-0.2 mm; CAL gain: 1.0+/-0.3 mm).

CONCLUSION

Both treatment procedures have shown efficacy over a period of 24 months, however, the application of NBM+CM may result in an improved outcome of healing.

摘要

目的

本病例系列的目的是评估使用纳米晶羟基磷灰石(NHA)或天然骨矿物质与胶原膜联合应用(NBM+CM)治疗种植体周围炎病变后2年的结果。

材料与方法

22例中度种植体周围炎患者(22例骨内缺损)被随机分为两组,分别接受(i)翻瓣手术(AFS)并应用NHA,或AFS并应用NBM+CM。在基线以及非潜入式愈合12、18和24个月后记录临床参数。

结果

NHA组有2例患者因12个月时严重化脓而被排除在研究之外。在24个月时,两组均显示出临床上显著的探诊深度(PD)降低(NHA组:1.5±0.6mm;NBM+CM组:2.4±0.8mm)和临床附着水平(CAL)增加(NHA组:1.0±0.4mm;NBM+CM组:2.0±0.8mm)。然而,NBM+CM组的这些临床改善似乎更好(组间差异:PD降低:0.9±0.2mm;CAL增加:1.0±0.3mm)。

结论

两种治疗方法在24个月内均显示出疗效,然而,应用NBM+CM可能会导致更好的愈合结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验