Ueki Y, Sagawa A, Tanimura K, Yamada A, Yamamoto K, Tsuda H, Tohma S, Suzuki K, Tominaga M, Kawabe Y, Mine M, Honda S, Tsukano M, Nakamura T, Hidaka T, Eguchi K
Rheumatic and Collagen Disease Center, Sasebo Chuo Hospital, The University of Tokyo, Sasebo, Japan. u-yuki@
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(6):810-6.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of leukocytapheresis (LCAP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that is refractory to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), we conducted a prospective, multicenter, open-label clinical trial.
We enrolled 38 active RA patients, including 32 patients who showed an inadequate response to > or = 2 DMARDs and 6 patients with rapidly progressive RA. All patients continued drug therapy and were treated with 5 LCAP sessions conducted at 1-week intervals. The clinical response was evaluated at baseline before starting LCAP and at 4 weeks after the completion of all the LCAP sessions using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and the 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR).
Of the 35 patients who fulfilled the study's eligibility criteria, 24 (69%), 10 (29%), and 23 (66%) patients achieved 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and DAS28-C-reactive protein (CRP) EULAR improvement, respectively. The mean DAS28-CRP score of the 35 patients decreased significantly from 5.99 +/- 0.92 at baseline to 4.54 +/- 1.39 after treatment. Comparison analysis of the ACR20 responders and non-responders to LCAP revealed that 22 of 24 responders (92%) concomitantly received methotrexate, whereas significantly fewer, that is, 6 of 11 non-responders (55%) received methotrexate. Less frequent and transient mild-to-moderate adverse events, including nausea and headache, were seen in 12 of 189 LCAP sessions (6.3%).
These results demonstrate the usefulness of LCAP in combination with DMARDs, particularly methotrexate, as an effective and safe treatment for refractory RA.
为评估白细胞去除术(LCAP)对难治性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效及安全性,我们开展了一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签的临床试验。
我们纳入了38例活动期RA患者,其中32例对≥2种改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)反应欠佳,6例为快速进展性RA。所有患者继续药物治疗,并接受间隔1周进行的5次LCAP治疗。在开始LCAP前的基线期以及所有LCAP治疗结束后4周,使用美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准和欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)的28个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)评估临床反应。
在符合研究纳入标准的35例患者中,分别有24例(69%)、10例(29%)和23例(66%)患者实现了20%(ACR20)、50%(ACR50)的改善以及DAS28 - C反应蛋白(CRP)达到EULAR改善标准。35例患者的平均DAS28 - CRP评分从基线时的5.99±0.92显著降至治疗后的4.54±1.39。对LCAP治疗的ACR20反应者和无反应者进行比较分析发现,24例反应者中有22例(92%)同时接受了甲氨蝶呤治疗,而无反应者中接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的比例显著更低,即11例无反应者中有6例(55%)。在189次LCAP治疗中有12次(6.3%)出现了频率较低且短暂的轻至中度不良事件,包括恶心和头痛。
这些结果表明,LCAP联合DMARDs,尤其是甲氨蝶呤,作为难治性RA的一种有效且安全的治疗方法是有用的。