Vu Christy Q, Roberts W Eugene, Hartsfield James K, Ofner Susan
Section of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Ind 46202, USA.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jan;133(1):9.e1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.012.
Clinical cases completed by the Indiana University School of Dentistry (IUSD) graduating orthodontic classes of 2004, 2005, and 2006 were assessed to determine factors that affect orthodontic treatment duration.
The sample consisted of 455 consecutively finished patients who received comprehensive treatment in the full permanent dentition. They included optimally finished and prematurely terminated (early debond) patients. The American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) discrepancy index (DI) was used to evaluate the severity of the pretreatment malocclusion. A specifically designed treatment complexity index (TCI) was used to evaluate complexity based on treatment modalities. The ABO objective grading system (OGS) and the IUSD comprehensive clinical assessment (CCA) were used to evaluate the clinical outcome for all patients.
The average treatment duration was 29 months. The mean DI, OGS, and CCA scores were 15.30, 23.34, and 4.48, respectively. Increased treatment length was associated with 0.022-in slot size brackets, percent of treatment spent in nickel-titanium wires, Class II malocclusion, increased DI score, and increased TCI score. In evaluating outcomes for 2004 through 2006, there was no significant relationship between treatment duration and clinical outcome as measured by the OGS and CCA scores.
The DI and TCI are sensitive prospective indicators of treatment duration. After the introduction of a rigorous clinical protocol for controlling poor outcomes, because of patients exceeding predicted treatment times, the clinical results for this sample are independent of treatment duration.
对印第安纳大学牙科学院(IUSD)2004、2005和2006级正畸专业毕业生完成的临床病例进行评估,以确定影响正畸治疗疗程的因素。
样本包括455例连续完成全面恒牙列治疗的患者。他们包括治疗效果最佳和提前终止(早期拆除矫治器)的患者。美国正畸委员会(ABO)差异指数(DI)用于评估治疗前错牙合畸形的严重程度。一个专门设计的治疗复杂性指数(TCI)用于根据治疗方式评估复杂性。ABO客观分级系统(OGS)和IUSD综合临床评估(CCA)用于评估所有患者的临床结果。
平均治疗疗程为29个月。DI、OGS和CCA的平均得分分别为15.30、23.34和4.48。治疗时间延长与0.022英寸槽沟尺寸托槽、使用镍钛丝的治疗时间百分比、安氏II类错牙合、DI得分增加和TCI得分增加有关。在评估2004年至2006年的治疗结果时,OGS和CCA得分所衡量的治疗时间与临床结果之间没有显著关系。
DI和TCI是治疗时间的敏感前瞻性指标。在引入严格的临床方案以控制不良治疗结果后,由于患者超过预测治疗时间,该样本的临床结果与治疗时间无关。