Chou Li-Wei, Kesar Trisha M, Binder-Macleod Stuart A
Department of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz, USA.
Phys Ther. 2008 Mar;88(3):363-75. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070201. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
During functional electrical stimulation (FES), clinicians typically increase stimulation intensity to offset fatigue and maintain functional levels of force production. However, recent studies have suggested that increasing the stimulation frequency is an effective strategy for overcoming fatigue during FES. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 5 stimulation strategies on maintaining forces during repetitive isometric muscle activation.
The right quadriceps femoris muscles of 12 subjects with no history of lower-extremity orthopedic, neurological, or vascular problems were tested. The 5 stimulation strategies were: progressively increasing the frequency, progressively increasing the intensity, and 3 combination protocols that first increased the intensity and then increased the frequency. The only difference among the 3 combination protocols was the starting frequency used in each protocol (20, 30, or 40 Hz). For all protocols, the stimulation frequency or intensity was increased progressively every time the peak force declined more than 10% from a targeted force level. The specific step increases in frequency or intensity were customized for each subject. A contraction was defined as successful when its peak force exceeded 90% of the targeted force level.
The results showed that progressively increasing only the frequency produced 59% more successful contractions than progressively increasing only the intensity. In addition, the combination stimulation protocol that began with 30-Hz trains produced the most successful contractions (mean=1,205 contractions; 35%-74% more than the other 4 protocols tested).
The results suggest that increasing the stimulation intensity and then the frequency is the best strategy to maintain muscle performance and could help clinicians design optimal stimulation protocols to use for each patient during FES.
在功能性电刺激(FES)过程中,临床医生通常会增加刺激强度以抵消疲劳并维持功能性力量产生水平。然而,最近的研究表明,增加刺激频率是克服FES期间疲劳的有效策略。本研究的目的是比较5种刺激策略在重复性等长肌肉激活过程中维持力量的有效性。
对12名无下肢骨科、神经或血管问题病史的受试者的右侧股四头肌进行测试。5种刺激策略为:逐渐增加频率、逐渐增加强度,以及3种先增加强度然后增加频率的联合方案。这3种联合方案之间的唯一区别是每种方案中使用的起始频率(20、30或40Hz)。对于所有方案,每当峰值力从目标力水平下降超过10%时,刺激频率或强度就会逐渐增加。频率或强度的具体增加步长是为每个受试者定制的。当收缩的峰值力超过目标力水平的90%时,该收缩被定义为成功。
结果表明,仅逐渐增加频率产生的成功收缩次数比仅逐渐增加强度多59%。此外,以30Hz序列开始的联合刺激方案产生的成功收缩次数最多(平均 = 1205次收缩;比其他4种测试方案多35% - 74%)。
结果表明,先增加刺激强度然后增加频率是维持肌肉性能的最佳策略,并且可以帮助临床医生设计最佳刺激方案,以便在FES期间用于每个患者。