Rose Anne C
Department of History, 108 Weaver Building, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Hist Psychol. 2007 Aug;10(3):249-78. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.10.3.249.
Although the psychology of race in America has been the subject of significant research, psychological science in the principal region of racial interaction before Brown v. Board of Education-the South--has received little attention. This article argues that the introduction of psychological ideas about children by means of school reform in the South during the half-century before the Brown decision established a cultural foundation for both Black resistance to segregated schools and White determination to preserve them. In 1900, southern children and their schools were an afterthought in a culture more committed to tradition and racial stability than innovation and individual achievement. The advent of northern philanthropy, however, brought with it a new psychology of childhood. Although the reformers did not intend to subvert segregation, their premises downplayed natural endowment, including racial inheritance, and favored concepts highlighting nurture: that personality is developmental, childhood foundational, and adversity detrimental. Decades of discussion of children in their learning environment gave southern Blacks a rationale for protest and Whites a logical defense for conservative reaction.
尽管美国种族心理学一直是大量研究的主题,但在布朗诉托皮卡教育局案之前种族互动的主要地区——南方——的心理科学却很少受到关注。本文认为,在布朗案裁决前的半个世纪里,南方通过学校改革引入的有关儿童的心理学观念,为黑人抵制种族隔离学校和白人维护这些学校的决心奠定了文化基础。1900年,在一种更致力于传统和种族稳定而非创新和个人成就的文化中,南方儿童及其学校是被忽视的。然而,北方慈善事业的出现带来了一种新的儿童心理学。尽管改革者无意颠覆种族隔离,但他们的前提淡化了包括种族遗传在内的天赋,而倾向于强调后天培养的观念:即个性是发展性的,童年是基础性的,逆境是有害的。几十年关于儿童学习环境的讨论,给了南方黑人抗议的理由,也给了白人保守反应的合理辩护。