• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Biological evaluation of In-Ceram-ceramics compared to cobalt-base-alloys and the metals titanium, tantalum and niobium in animal experiments].

作者信息

Limberger F, Lenz E

机构信息

Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Medizinischen Akademie Erfurt.

出版信息

Dtsch Stomatol (1990). 1991;41(11):407-10.

PMID:1817651
Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of the in-cream-ceramic-system in several technological phases by animal experiments. The comparative materials were the Co-Cr-alloys Remanium CD and Wirobond and the implant materials Titanium, Tantalum and Columbium and the high biocompatible material Teflon. The experiments were carried out in accordance with the DIN-standard 13,930 using subcutaneous implantation to verify the toxicity of the materials. 20 cylindrical test pieces were implanted into the subcutaneous connective tissue of the neck in rats. After 12 weeks the animals were sacrificed and the implants were removed with the surrounding tissues. The thickness of the fibrous capsule and the number of cells within the capsule were measured microscopically. The in-ceram-ceramic-system showed the same results like approved Co-Cr-alloys. The results of the implant materials were not attained.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Biological evaluation of In-Ceram-ceramics compared to cobalt-base-alloys and the metals titanium, tantalum and niobium in animal experiments].
Dtsch Stomatol (1990). 1991;41(11):407-10.
2
Evaluation of tissue reaction to some denture-base materials: an animal study.某些义齿基托材料的组织反应评估:一项动物研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 May 1;9(4):67-74.
3
[Histocompatibility of implant materials--animal model criteria and findings].
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1991 Oct;46(10):694-8.
4
[Implants in odontological prosthetics].[口腔修复学中的植入物]
Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid. 1974 Nov;84(10):405-9.
5
Tissue reactions to some dental implant materials. An in vivo study in white rats.
Odontol Revy. 1975;26(3):231-8.
6
The electrochemical behavior of metallic implant materials as an indicator of their biocompatibility.金属植入材料的电化学行为作为其生物相容性的一个指标。
J Biomed Mater Res. 1987 Jul;21(7):881-96. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820210705.
7
Cytotoxicity of dental alloys, metals, and ceramics assessed by millipore filter, agar overlay, and MTT tests.通过微孔滤膜法、琼脂覆盖法和MTT试验评估牙科合金、金属和陶瓷的细胞毒性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Aug;84(2):229-36. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.107227.
8
[Experimental comparison of tissue response to various endosseous implants].
Dent Cadmos. 1984 Nov;52(11):99, 101, 103-4.
9
Evaluation of the biocompatibility of various dental alloys: Part I--Toxic potentials.各种牙科合金的生物相容性评估:第一部分——毒性潜力。
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1996 Sep;4(3):129-36.
10
Comparison of titanium-tantalum and titanium-niobium alloys for application as dental implants.用于牙科植入物的钛钽合金和钛铌合金的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989 Summer;4(2):113-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cell response to a newly developed Ti-10Ta-10Nb alloy and its sputtered nanoscale coating.细胞对新开发的 Ti-10Ta-10Nb 合金及其溅射纳米级涂层的反应。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2009 Mar;1(1):56-61. doi: 10.4047/jap.2009.1.1.56. Epub 2009 Mar 31.