Sanches Karina, de Carvalho Fabrício Kitazono, Nelson-Filho Paulo, Assed Sada, Silva Francisco Wanderley Garcia de Paula E, de Queiroz Alexandra Mussolino
Department of Pediatric Clinics, Preventive and Community Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2007;18(3):248-52. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402007000300014.
This article reports the cases of two young children aged 4 and 5 years, in whom biological restorations using tooth fragments were placed in primary molars with severely damaged crowns due to extensive carious lesions. After radiographic and clinical evaluation, tooth fragments obtained from extracted teeth in stock were autoclaved, adjusted to the prepared cavity and bonded to the remaining tooth structure with either adhesive system (Case 1) or dual-cure resin-based cement (Case 2) over a calcium hydroxide layer and a glass ionomer cement base. Occlusal adjustment was performed and topical sodium fluoride was applied to tooth surface. Periodical clinical and radiographic controls were carried out and the restored teeth were followed up for 4 and 3 years, respectively, until exfoliation. In these two reports, the technical aspects are described and the benefits and disadvantages of biological restorations as an alternative treatment for rehabilitation of severely destroyed primary molars are discussed.
本文报道了两名4岁和5岁幼儿的病例,他们的乳磨牙因广泛龋损导致牙冠严重受损,采用了利用牙碎片进行的生物修复。经过影像学和临床评估后,从库存拔牙中获取的牙碎片进行高压灭菌,调整至预备好的窝洞,在氢氧化钙层和玻璃离子水门汀基底上,用粘结系统(病例1)或双固化树脂水门汀(病例2)粘结到剩余牙体结构上。进行了咬合调整,并在牙表面应用了局部氟化钠。进行了定期的临床和影像学检查,修复后的牙齿分别随访了4年和3年,直至乳牙脱落。在这两份报告中,描述了技术细节,并讨论了生物修复作为严重破坏的乳磨牙修复替代治疗方法的优缺点。