Casagrande Luciano, Dalpian Débora Martini, Ardenghi Thiago Machado, Zanatta Fabrício Batistin, Balbinot Carlos Eduardo Agostini, García-Godoy Franklin, De Araujo Fernando Borba
Am J Dent. 2013 Dec;26(6):351-5.
To evaluate the clinical performance of adhesive restorations of resin composite and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements in primary molars.
This randomized clinical trial included subjects (5-9 year-old children) selected at two university centers (UFRGS and UNIFRA). The sample consisted of 132 primary molars presenting active cavitated carious lesions (with radiographic involvement of the inner half of the dentin), located on the occlusal and occlusal-proximal surface. The sample was randomly divided into three groups, according to the restorative material: (G1) universal restorative system (Adper Single Bond 2 system and Filtek Z350); (G2): Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (Vitremer); and (G3): Low shrink restorative system (Filtek P90). The restorations were clinically and radiographically followed every 6 months for up to 18 months using the USPHS modified criteria for clinical evaluation. Survival estimates for restoration longevity were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test (P< 0.05) was used to compare the differences in the success rate according to the type of the restorative material.
The type of restorative material used did not influence the longevity of the restorations. After clinical follow-up, there was no statistical difference in the rates of success for the three materials used to restore active cavitated carious lesions in primary molars. The survival rates for the follow-up were similar regarding the number of restored surfaces and the caries removal technique (partial or complete). Mean estimated time of survival was 17.2 months (95% CI: 16.7-17.7). Estimated survival rates of the restorations were 100%, 98%, 88% and 65% at 1, 6, 12 and 18 months of clinical evaluations, respectively.
评估树脂复合材料和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀在乳磨牙粘结修复中的临床性能。
这项随机临床试验纳入了在两个大学中心(阿雷格里港联邦大学和弗拉联邦大学)选取的受试者(5至9岁儿童)。样本包括132颗患有活动性龋洞病变(牙本质内半部分有影像学累及)的乳磨牙,病变位于咬合面和咬合邻面。根据修复材料,样本被随机分为三组:(G1)通用修复系统(Adper Single Bond 2系统和Filtek Z350);(G2)树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(Vitremer);(G3)低收缩修复系统(Filtek P90)。使用美国公共卫生署改良的临床评估标准,每6个月对修复体进行临床和影像学随访,最长随访18个月。使用Kaplan-Meier方法评估修复体寿命的生存估计值。采用对数秩检验(P<0.05)比较不同修复材料类型的成功率差异。
所用修复材料的类型不影响修复体的寿命。临床随访后,用于修复乳磨牙活动性龋洞病变的三种材料的成功率无统计学差异。修复面数量和龋洞去除技术(部分或完全)方面,随访的生存率相似。平均估计生存时间为17.2个月(95%置信区间:16.7 - 17.7)。在临床评估的1、6、12和18个月时,修复体的估计生存率分别为100%、98%、88%和65%。