• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受宫颈环扎术的单胎妊娠女性中,两针与一针预防早产的效果比较。

Effect of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch on the prevention of preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies who undergo cervical cerclage.

作者信息

Woensdregt Karlijn, Norwitz Errol R, Cackovic Michael, Paidas Michael J, Illuzzi Jessica L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;198(4):396.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.782. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.782
PMID:18177834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2757008/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates whether 2 cerclage stitches are more effective than 1 stitch in the prevention of preterm birth.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of 150 singleton pregnancies that underwent cervical cerclage. Gestational age at delivery and clinical characteristics were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred twelve patients (74.7%) received 1 stitch, and 38 patients (25.3%) received 2 stitches. There were no baseline differences between the groups. Analysis showed no significant difference in gestational age at delivery between the 1 vs 2 cerclage groups overall (median, 38.0 vs 38.3 weeks of gestation, respectively; P = .356) or for a given gestational age cut-off (<37 weeks of gestation: 37.4% vs 34.2% [P = .727]; <34 weeks of gestation: 16.8% vs 18.4% [P = .823]; <28 weeks of gestation: 9.4% vs 2.6% [P = .179]).

CONCLUSION

This study shows no measurable benefit to the placement of 2 stitches over 1 stitch during cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancies; however, further study of preterm birth at <28 weeks of gestation and postcerclage outcomes among a larger cohort is merited.

摘要

目的

本研究调查在预防早产方面,2 针宫颈环扎术是否比 1 针更有效。

研究设计

这是一项对 150 例接受宫颈环扎术的单胎妊娠进行的回顾性队列研究。比较了分娩时的孕周和临床特征。

结果

112 例患者(74.7%)接受了 1 针环扎,38 例患者(25.3%)接受了 2 针环扎。两组之间无基线差异。分析显示,总体上,1 针与 2 针环扎组在分娩时的孕周无显著差异(中位数分别为 38.0 周和 38.3 周;P = 0.356),对于给定的孕周截断值也是如此(孕周<37 周:37.4%对 34.2%[P = 0.727];孕周<34 周:16.8%对 18.4%[P = 0.823];孕周<28 周:9.4%对 2.6%[P = 0.179])。

结论

本研究表明,在单胎妊娠的宫颈环扎术中,2 针环扎并不比 1 针环扎有可测量的益处;然而,对于孕周<28 周的早产及更大队列中环扎术后结局进行进一步研究是有必要的。

相似文献

1
Effect of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch on the prevention of preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies who undergo cervical cerclage.在接受宫颈环扎术的单胎妊娠女性中,两针与一针预防早产的效果比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;198(4):396.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.782. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
2
Comparison of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch for transvaginal cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention.比较 2 针与 1 针经阴道宫颈环扎术预防早产
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;208(3):209.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.039. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
3
Cervical cerclage: one stitch or two?宫颈环扎术:一针还是两针?
Am J Perinatol. 2012 Jun;29(6):477-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304831. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
4
[Analysis of clinical effect of cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies with cervical length ≤15 mm at different gestational ages].不同孕周宫颈长度≤15mm双胎妊娠行宫颈环扎术的临床效果分析
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Feb 25;60(2):99-104. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20241018-00560.
5
Transvaginal cervical cerclage: double monofilament modified Wurm vs single braided McDonald technique.经阴道宫颈环扎术:双股单丝改良Wurm法与单股编织McDonald法对比
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Mar;65(3):344-352. doi: 10.1002/uog.29184. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
6
Comparison of two stitches versus one stitch for emergency cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.单胎妊娠中紧急宫颈环扎术采用两针与一针预防早产的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Jan;160(1):98-105. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14213. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
7
Rate of preterm delivery and latency period in asymptomatic patients undergoing cerclage for very short cervix ≤10.0 mm.行宫颈环扎术的极短宫颈(≤10.0mm)无症状患者的早产率和潜伏期。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Nov;6(11):101496. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101496. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
8
Beyond Cervical Length: Association between Postcerclage Transvaginal Ultrasound Parameters and Preterm Birth.超越宫颈长度:宫颈环扎术后经阴道超声参数与早产的关系。
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Nov;36(13):1317-1324. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688480. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
9
[Clinical study of modified cervical cerclage at different surgical timings in twin pregnant women with cervical insufficiency].[双胎妊娠合并宫颈机能不全不同手术时机改良宫颈环扎术的临床研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Feb 25;60(2):105-113. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20241105-00586.
10
History-indicated cervical cerclage in management of twin pregnancy.病史提示的宫颈环扎术在双胎妊娠管理中的应用。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):517-523. doi: 10.1002/uog.20192. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Transvaginal cervical cerclage: double monofilament modified Wurm vs single braided McDonald technique.经阴道宫颈环扎术:双股单丝改良Wurm法与单股编织McDonald法对比
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Mar;65(3):344-352. doi: 10.1002/uog.29184. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
Postoperative cervical length to predict success of repeat cerclage in singleton pregnancies with prolapsed membranes after prior cerclage.术后宫颈长度预测既往行宫颈环扎术的单胎妊娠胎膜早破患者再次宫颈环扎术的成功率。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 21;10:1248321. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1248321. eCollection 2023.
3
Emergency cerclage using double-level versus single-level suture in the management of cervical insufficiency (Cervical Occlusion double-level Stitch Application, ): study protocol for a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial.双水平与单水平缝线紧急宫颈环扎术治疗宫颈机能不全的比较(Cervical Occlusion double-level Stitch Application,CODA 研究):一项多中心、非盲、随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 7;13(6):e071564. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071564.
4
Reducing the Risk of Preterm Birth by Ambulatory Risk Factor Management.通过门诊危险因素管理降低早产风险。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Dec 13;116(50):858-864. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0858.
5
Influence of cervical cerclage interventions upon the incidence of neonatal death: a retrospective study comparing prophylactic versus rescue cerclages.宫颈环扎术对新生儿死亡率的影响:一项比较预防性环扎术与补救性环扎术的回顾性研究。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018 Mar;10(1):29-36.
6
Role of Cervical Cerclage and Vaginal Progesterone in the Treatment of Cervical Incompetence with/without Preterm Birth History.宫颈环扎术与阴道用孕激素在治疗有无早产史的宫颈机能不全中的作用
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Nov 20;129(22):2670-2675. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.193451.
7
Suture type and ultrasound-indicated cerclage efficacy.缝合类型与超声引导下宫颈环扎术的疗效
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Nov;25(11):2287-90. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.688081. Epub 2012 May 14.
8
Viable extreme preterm birth and some neonatal outcomes in double cerclage versus traditional cerclage: a randomized clinical trial.双重宫颈环扎术与传统宫颈环扎术治疗存活的极早早产及某些新生儿结局:一项随机临床试验
ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:1660-6. doi: 10.1100/2011/486259. Epub 2011 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
ACOG Practice Bulletin. Cervical insufficiency.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告。宫颈机能不全。
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):1091-9. doi: 10.1016/j.obstetgynecol.2003.09.029.
2
Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery: meta-analysis of randomized trials.宫颈环扎术预防早产:随机试验的荟萃分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;102(3):621-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00673-2.
3
Elective cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review.择期宫颈环扎术预防早产:一项系统评价
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 May;82(5):398-404. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00081.x.
4
Abdominal versus vaginal cerclage after a failed transvaginal cerclage: a systematic review.经阴道宫颈环扎失败后腹式与阴道式宫颈环扎术:一项系统评价
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Oct;187(4):868-72. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.126959.
5
Cervical incompetence: elective, emergent, or urgent cerclage.宫颈机能不全:择期、急诊或紧急宫颈环扎术。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Aug;181(2):240-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70542-9.
6
Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage.医学研究委员会/皇家妇产科学院宫颈环扎术多中心随机试验的最终报告。医学研究委员会/皇家妇产科学院宫颈环扎术工作小组。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Jun;100(6):516-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15300.x.
7
Multicentred controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at moderate risk of preterm delivery.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Aug;91(8):731-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04841.x.
8
A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Aug;91(8):724-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04840.x.
9
Cervical incompetence.
Fertil Steril. 1989 Aug;52(2):181-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60839-7.
10
Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage: a reappraisal 25 years after its introduction.经腹宫颈峡部环扎术:引入25年后的重新评估
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;164(6 Pt 1):1635-41; discussion 1641-2. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)91448-6.