• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单胎妊娠中紧急宫颈环扎术采用两针与一针预防早产的比较。

Comparison of two stitches versus one stitch for emergency cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.

作者信息

Xu Zhi-Min, Zhang Jun, Hong Xiao-Lan, Liu Jing, Yang Zhen-Zhen, Pan Mian

机构信息

Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Jan;160(1):98-105. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14213. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1002/ijgo.14213
PMID:35396704
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of two stitches versus one stitch in women with emergency cervical cerclage.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study of 26 women with singleton pregnancies who underwent emergency cervical cerclage before 26 weeks. A comparison was made between patients with two stitches versus one stitch at the time of cervical cerclage placement. The primary outcome was gestational age (GA) at delivery and preterm birth (PTB) before 37, 34, 32, 28, and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Average GA at delivery in the two-stitches group was significantly greater than in the one-stitch group (32.71 ± 5.54 weeks vs 27.99 ± 4.70 weeks, P = 0.028). There were significant decreases in the incidence of spontaneous PTB at <34 weeks and less than 32 weeks in the two-stitches group (P = 0.034; P = 0.013, respectively). The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions rate and length of stay in the NICU in the two-stitches group were significantly reduced (P = 0.035 and P = 0.018, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in neonatal mortality between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with emergency cervical cerclage placement with one stitch, the procedure with two stitches can prolong the pregnancy and improve the neonatal prognosis more effectively.

摘要

目的

比较在进行紧急宫颈环扎术的女性中使用两针与一针的疗效。

方法

对26例单胎妊娠且在26周前接受紧急宫颈环扎术的女性进行回顾性病例对照研究。比较宫颈环扎术时采用两针与一针的患者。主要结局指标为分娩时的孕周(GA)以及37、34、32、28和24周前的早产(PTB)情况。

结果

两针组的平均分娩孕周显著大于一针组(32.71±5.54周 vs 27.99±4.70周,P = 0.028)。两针组在<34周和<32周时的自发性PTB发生率显著降低(分别为P = 0.034;P = 0.013)。两针组的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)收治率和在NICU的住院时间显著降低(分别为P = 0.035和P = 0.018)。然而,两组之间的新生儿死亡率无显著差异。

结论

与一针紧急宫颈环扎术相比,两针手术能更有效地延长孕周并改善新生儿预后。

相似文献

1
Comparison of two stitches versus one stitch for emergency cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.单胎妊娠中紧急宫颈环扎术采用两针与一针预防早产的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Jan;160(1):98-105. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14213. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
2
Comparison of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch for transvaginal cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention.比较 2 针与 1 针经阴道宫颈环扎术预防早产
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;208(3):209.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.039. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
3
Effect of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch on the prevention of preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies who undergo cervical cerclage.在接受宫颈环扎术的单胎妊娠女性中,两针与一针预防早产的效果比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;198(4):396.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.782. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
4
Cervical stitch (cerclage) in combination with other treatments for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies.宫颈环扎术联合其他治疗方法用于预防单胎妊娠自发性早产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 24;9(9):CD012871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012871.pub2.
5
Cervical length, cervical dilation, and gestational age at cerclage placement and the risk of preterm birth in women undergoing ultrasound or exam indicated Shirodkar cerclage.宫颈长度、宫颈扩张程度、宫颈环扎术时的孕周以及超声或检查提示行 Shirodkar 宫颈环扎术的孕妇发生早产的风险。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Aug;33(15):2527-2532. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1554050. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
6
Comparison of two emergency cervical cerclage techniques in twin pregnancies: A retrospective cohort study matched with cervical dilation.两种紧急宫颈环扎术在双胎妊娠中的比较:一项与宫颈扩张相匹配的回顾性队列研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Mar;164(3):1036-1046. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15081. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
7
Cervical cerclage for singleton pregnant patients on vaginal progesterone with progressive cervical shortening.经阴道给予孕激素的单胎妊娠患者,出现进行性宫颈缩短时行宫颈环扎术。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;219(4):397.e1-397.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.020. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
8
Cervical cerclage: one stitch or two?宫颈环扎术:一针还是两针?
Am J Perinatol. 2012 Jun;29(6):477-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304831. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
9
[Clinical outcomes and influence factors of 435 singleton pregnancies with short cervix].435例单胎妊娠合并宫颈短的临床结局及影响因素
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 25;56(2):89-95. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200925-00740.
10
Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.双胎妊娠中体格检查指征性宫颈环扎术:一项回顾性队列研究
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;303(3):665-676. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05777-y. Epub 2020 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical analysis of cerclage as a treatment for cervical insufficiency.宫颈环扎术治疗宫颈机能不全的力学分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jan;311(1):87-90. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07838-y. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
2
Postoperative cervical length to predict success of repeat cerclage in singleton pregnancies with prolapsed membranes after prior cerclage.术后宫颈长度预测既往行宫颈环扎术的单胎妊娠胎膜早破患者再次宫颈环扎术的成功率。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 21;10:1248321. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1248321. eCollection 2023.
3
Emergency cerclage using double-level versus single-level suture in the management of cervical insufficiency (Cervical Occlusion double-level Stitch Application, ): study protocol for a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial.
双水平与单水平缝线紧急宫颈环扎术治疗宫颈机能不全的比较(Cervical Occlusion double-level Stitch Application,CODA 研究):一项多中心、非盲、随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 7;13(6):e071564. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071564.