• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

香料成分研究协会的人体重复损伤斑贴试验方案。

The Research Institute for Fragrance Materials' human repeated insult patch test protocol.

作者信息

Politano Valerie T, Api Anne Marie

机构信息

Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;52(1):35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.11.004. Epub 2007 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.11.004
PMID:18177987
Abstract

With implementation of the dermal sensitization QRA approach for fragrance ingredients, IFRA/RIFM are recommending use of the RIFM standard human repeated insult patch test (HRIPT) protocol for generation of confirmatory human data for the induction of dermal sensitization in a normal human population. Details of this standard HRIPT protocol are provided in this paper. The study protocol consists of two phases--Induction and Challenge. In the Induction phase, patches treated with fragrance ingredients in 75% diethyl phthalate/25% ethanol are applied to backs of volunteers for 24h. Following patch removal there is a 24-h rest period and volunteers are patched again at the same site. This procedure is repeated to achieve 9 applications over a 3-week period. There is an approximate 2-week rest period followed by a Challenge phase of a single 24-h patch application of test article applied to a naïve site on the back. Skin reactions at the naïve site observed at Challenge may be suggestive of dermal sensitization, and a Rechallenge is performed to confirm the nature of the reactivity. This study is designed to confirm the No-Observed-Effect-Level for induction of dermal sensitization in a normal human population.

摘要

随着对香料成分实施皮肤致敏定量风险评估方法,国际日用香料协会(IFRA)/香料成分毒理评估专家小组(RIFM)建议采用RIFM标准人体重复性损伤斑贴试验(HRIPT)方案,以获取在正常人群中诱发皮肤致敏的验证性人体数据。本文提供了该标准HRIPT方案的详细信息。研究方案包括两个阶段——诱导阶段和激发阶段。在诱导阶段,将用75%邻苯二甲酸二乙酯/25%乙醇配制的香料成分处理过的贴片贴在志愿者背部24小时。去除贴片后有24小时的休息期,然后在同一部位再次给志愿者贴片。重复此过程,在3周内进行9次贴片。之后有大约2周的休息期,随后进入激发阶段,将受试物单次24小时贴片应用于背部一个未接触过受试物的部位。在激发阶段观察到的未接触过受试物部位的皮肤反应可能提示皮肤致敏,然后进行再激发以确认反应性的性质。本研究旨在确定在正常人群中诱发皮肤致敏的未观察到效应水平。

相似文献

1
The Research Institute for Fragrance Materials' human repeated insult patch test protocol.香料成分研究协会的人体重复损伤斑贴试验方案。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;52(1):35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.11.004. Epub 2007 Nov 28.
2
Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients.香料成分的皮肤致敏定量风险评估(QRA)。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;52(1):3-23. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.10.008. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
3
Implementation of the dermal sensitization Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients.香料成分皮肤致敏定量风险评估(QRA)的实施。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;52(1):53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 May 27.
4
Citral: identifying a threshold for induction of dermal sensitization.柠檬醛:确定皮肤致敏诱导阈值
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;52(1):62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Jan 26.
5
Sensitization methodology and primary prevention of the research institute for fragrance materials.香料研究所的致敏方法及一级预防
Dermatology. 2002;205(1):84-7. doi: 10.1159/000063153.
6
Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.羟基异己基 3-环己烯甲醛过敏:斑贴试验与重复开放应用试验阈值之间的关系。
Br J Dermatol. 2009 Sep;161(3):560-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09256.x. Epub 2009 May 27.
7
Amended final report on the safety assessment of glyceryl dilaurate, glyceryl diarachidate, glyceryl dibehenate, glyceryl dierucate, glyceryl dihydroxystearate, glyceryl diisopalmitate, glyceryl diisostearate, glyceryl dilinoleate, glyceryl dimyristate, glyceryl dioleate, glyceryl diricinoleate, glyceryl dipalmitate, glyceryl dipalmitoleate, glyceryl distearate, glyceryl palmitate lactate, glyceryl stearate citrate, glyceryl stearate lactate, and glyceryl stearate succinate.关于二月桂酸甘油酯、二花生酸甘油酯、二山嵛酸甘油酯、二芥酸甘油酯、二羟基硬脂酸甘油酯、二异棕榈酸甘油酯、二异硬脂酸甘油酯、二亚油酸甘油酯、二肉豆蔻酸甘油酯、二油酸甘油酯、二蓖麻油酸甘油酯、二棕榈酸甘油酯、二棕榈油酸甘油酯、二硬脂酸甘油酯、棕榈酸乳酸甘油酯、柠檬酸硬脂酸甘油酯、乳酸硬脂酸甘油酯和琥珀酸硬脂酸甘油酯安全性评估的修订最终报告。
Int J Toxicol. 2007;26 Suppl 3:1-30. doi: 10.1080/10915810701663143.
8
Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants.婴儿对硫酸镍和香料混合物斑贴试验的反应性。
Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Sep;51(3):141-7. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00425.x.
9
The human repeated insult patch test in the 21st century: a commentary.21世纪的人体重复刺激斑贴试验:一篇评论
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2009;28(2):49-53. doi: 10.1080/15569520902938032.
10
Considerations for testing irritancy, allergy, and photoreactivity in fragrance safety evaluations.香料安全性评估中刺激性、过敏性和光反应性测试的注意事项。
Am J Contact Dermat. 2003 Jun;14(2):100-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Skin evaluation of turmeric/epigallocatechin-3-gallate emulgel for skin irritation and sensitisation effects in healthy Thai participants (TULIP): a protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.姜黄/表没食子儿茶素-3-没食子酸酯乳胶对泰国健康参与者皮肤刺激和致敏作用的皮肤评估(TULIP):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 28;15(7):e103571. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103571.
2
Longevity cosmeceuticals as the next frontier in cosmetic innovation: a scientific framework for substantiating product claims.长寿美容药妆作为美容创新的下一个前沿领域:证实产品宣称的科学框架。
Front Aging. 2025 May 22;6:1586999. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1586999. eCollection 2025.
3
Skin Rejuvenation Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Standardized Extract (BG100) in Human 3D Skin Models and Clinical Trial.
标准化提取物(BG100)在人体 3D 皮肤模型中的皮肤焕肤功效和安全性评价及临床试验。
Biomolecules. 2024 Jun 29;14(7):776. doi: 10.3390/biom14070776.
4
Use of human predictive patch test (HPPT) data for the classification of skin sensitization hazard and potency.利用人类预测斑贴试验(HPPT)数据对皮肤致敏危害和强度进行分类。
Arch Toxicol. 2024 May;98(5):1253-1269. doi: 10.1007/s00204-023-03656-4. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
5
Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients.基于证据权重法的香料致敏原强度分类。
Dermatitis. 2022;33(2):161-175. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000854.
6
Fragrance Skin Sensitization Evaluation and Human Testing: 30-Year Experience.香味皮肤致敏评价和人体测试:30 年经验。
Dermatitis. 2021;32(5):339-352. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000684.
7
International regulatory requirements for skin sensitization testing.国际皮肤致敏试验监管要求。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Jun;95:52-65. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
8
Fragrances Categorized According to Relative Human Skin Sensitization Potency.根据相对人体皮肤致敏强度对香料进行分类。
Dermatitis. 2017 Sep/Oct;28(5):299-307. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000304.
9
QSAR models of human data can enrich or replace LLNA testing for human skin sensitization.人类数据的定量构效关系(QSAR)模型可以丰富或替代用于人类皮肤致敏性的局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)。
Green Chem. 2016 Dec 21;18(24):6501-6515. doi: 10.1039/C6GC01836J. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
10
Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.使用机器学习方法预测皮肤致敏潜力。
J Appl Toxicol. 2017 Jul;37(7):792-805. doi: 10.1002/jat.3424. Epub 2017 Jan 10.