Suppr超能文献

风险均衡与自愿免赔额:一种复杂的相互作用。

Risk equalization and voluntary deductibles: a complex interaction.

作者信息

van Kleef R C, Beck K, van de Ven W P M M, van Vliet R C J A

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2008 Mar;27(2):427-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Nov 29.

Abstract

The presence of voluntary deductibles in the Swiss and Dutch mandatory health insurance has important implications for the respective risk equalization systems. In a theoretical analysis, we discuss the consequences of equalizing three types of expenditures: the net claims that are reimbursed by the insurer, the out-of-pocket expenditures and the expenditure savings due to moral hazard reduction. Equalizing only the net claims, as done in Switzerland, creates incentives for cream skimming and prevents insurers from incorporating out-of-pocket expenditures and moral hazard reductions into their premium structure. In an empirical analysis, we examine the effect of self-selection and conclude that the Swiss and Dutch risk equalization systems do not fully adjust for differences in health status between those who choose a deductible and those who do not. We discuss how this may lead to incentives for cream skimming and to a reduction of cross-subsidies from healthy to unhealthy individuals compared to a situation without voluntary deductibles.

摘要

瑞士和荷兰的强制性医疗保险中自愿免赔额的存在,对各自的风险均等化系统具有重要影响。在一项理论分析中,我们讨论了均衡三种类型支出的后果:保险公司报销的净索赔、自付费用以及因减少道德风险而节省的支出。像瑞士那样仅均衡净索赔,会产生撇脂动机,并阻止保险公司将自付费用和道德风险降低纳入其保费结构。在一项实证分析中,我们研究了自我选择的影响,并得出结论:瑞士和荷兰的风险均等化系统并未充分调整选择免赔额者与未选择免赔额者之间的健康状况差异。我们讨论了与没有自愿免赔额的情况相比,这如何可能导致撇脂动机以及从健康个体到不健康个体的交叉补贴减少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验