van Kleef R C, Beck K, van de Ven W P M M, van Vliet R C J A
Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Health Econ. 2008 Mar;27(2):427-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
The presence of voluntary deductibles in the Swiss and Dutch mandatory health insurance has important implications for the respective risk equalization systems. In a theoretical analysis, we discuss the consequences of equalizing three types of expenditures: the net claims that are reimbursed by the insurer, the out-of-pocket expenditures and the expenditure savings due to moral hazard reduction. Equalizing only the net claims, as done in Switzerland, creates incentives for cream skimming and prevents insurers from incorporating out-of-pocket expenditures and moral hazard reductions into their premium structure. In an empirical analysis, we examine the effect of self-selection and conclude that the Swiss and Dutch risk equalization systems do not fully adjust for differences in health status between those who choose a deductible and those who do not. We discuss how this may lead to incentives for cream skimming and to a reduction of cross-subsidies from healthy to unhealthy individuals compared to a situation without voluntary deductibles.
瑞士和荷兰的强制性医疗保险中自愿免赔额的存在,对各自的风险均等化系统具有重要影响。在一项理论分析中,我们讨论了均衡三种类型支出的后果:保险公司报销的净索赔、自付费用以及因减少道德风险而节省的支出。像瑞士那样仅均衡净索赔,会产生撇脂动机,并阻止保险公司将自付费用和道德风险降低纳入其保费结构。在一项实证分析中,我们研究了自我选择的影响,并得出结论:瑞士和荷兰的风险均等化系统并未充分调整选择免赔额者与未选择免赔额者之间的健康状况差异。我们讨论了与没有自愿免赔额的情况相比,这如何可能导致撇脂动机以及从健康个体到不健康个体的交叉补贴减少。