Jansen Maria W J, De Vries Nanne K, Kok Gerjo, Van Oers Hans A M
Academic Collaborative Centre of Public Health Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Health Policy. 2008 May;86(2-3):295-307. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.11.005. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
The collaboration between policy, practice, and research in local public health was studied in a multiple case study. The assumption is that collaboration will result in more solid evidence and higher quality standards in public health.
First, collaboration barriers were studied by analysing the work cycles of the three domains, which are considered to operate as niches. Actors at the administrative, institutional, and individual levels were identified. Theories that describe processes of the convergence of the three niches through practical strategies were sought. Finally, the application of the practical strategies in six cases was evaluated.
When administrative, institutional, and individual changes develop in a similar fashion and in parallel with each other, the likelihood of successful collaboration that goes beyond the initial period is greater. The findings suggest that organisational development (OD) strategies that address collaboration at the institutional level make a relatively strong contribution.
Top level consultations just after local elections, investments in OD strategies and a new kind of accountability in public health are recommended. The assumption that successful collaboration contributes to enhanced effectiveness, efficiency, and efficacy of public health could not yet be unequivocally confirmed.
通过多案例研究探讨地方公共卫生领域政策、实践与研究之间的合作。假设是合作将带来更确凿的证据和更高的公共卫生质量标准。
首先,通过分析三个领域的工作周期来研究合作障碍,这三个领域被视为生态位。确定了行政、机构和个人层面的行为者。寻找描述通过实际策略使三个生态位趋同过程的理论。最后,评估了实际策略在六个案例中的应用。
当行政、机构和个人层面的变革以相似的方式且相互平行地发展时,超越初始阶段成功合作的可能性更大。研究结果表明,在机构层面解决合作问题的组织发展(OD)策略贡献相对较大。
建议在地方选举后立即进行高层协商,投资于OD策略,并在公共卫生领域建立一种新的问责制。成功合作有助于提高公共卫生的有效性、效率和效能这一假设尚未得到明确证实。