Mocé E, Graham J K
Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias-Centro de Tecnología Animal (IVIA-CITA), Polígono La Esperanza, n degrees 100, 12400-Segorbe (Castellón), Spain.
Anim Reprod Sci. 2008 Apr;105(1-2):104-18. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.11.016. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
This paper highlights selected laboratory analyses that are currently used to evaluate sperm, and describes why results from these assays do not consistently correlate with sperm fertility. Reasons for the disconnect between the two are due in part to the definition and reliability of the fertility data collected, to the complexity of the spermatozoon itself, to imprecision of some measurements, and to uncontrollable factors not associated to either the laboratory analysis or the sperm sample. Each sperm must possess a number of different attributes to fertilize an oocyte, and individual laboratory assays measure only one or a few of these attributes. Current and past data, correlating laboratory assay data with sperm fertility are presented in an effort to determine which types of assays are important to conduct and when to conduct them. Even though laboratory assay results do not allow accurate evaluation of the fertilizing potential of a semen sample, these assays are important to enable culling of poor quality samples.
本文重点介绍了目前用于评估精子的一些特定实验室分析方法,并阐述了为何这些检测结果与精子生育能力并非始终相关。两者脱节的原因部分在于所收集生育力数据的定义和可靠性、精子本身的复杂性、某些测量的不精确性以及与实验室分析或精子样本均无关的不可控因素。每个精子必须具备多种不同属性才能使卵母细胞受精,而单个实验室检测仅测量其中一种或几种属性。文中呈现了当前和过去将实验室检测数据与精子生育力相关联的数据,旨在确定哪些类型的检测很重要以及何时进行这些检测。尽管实验室检测结果无法准确评估精液样本的受精潜力,但这些检测对于筛选劣质样本很重要。