Graham J K
Department of Physiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Anim Reprod Sci. 2001 Dec 3;68(3-4):239-47. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(01)00160-9.
For many years, scientists have sought to develop laboratory assays that accurately predict the fertilizing capacity of a semen sample. This goal, however, has proven elusive and will most likely be very difficult to achieve, due to the complex nature of the problem. Part of the problem results from the many attributes that a spermatozoon must possess to fertilize an egg, and how laboratory assays can evaluate all of these attributes simultaneously. The percentage of motile sperm in a sample is most commonly used to evaluate semen quality. This assay, however, is not highly correlated with the fertilizing capacity of semen samples. One reason motion assays do not correlate well with fertility is that we are evaluating only one of many attributes that a sperm must possess to fertilize an oocyte. One of the problems of measuring multiple sperm attributes is the time and cost required. Using flow cytometric assays, multiple sperm attributes, including cell viability, acrosomal integrity, and mitochondrial function, can be measured simultaneously in sperm cells. In addition, the ability of sperm to undergo capacitation and the acrosome reaction, as well as the chromosomal integrity of sperm can be measured using flow cytometry. Flow cytometry permits us to evaluate 50,000 sperm in less then 1 min and at reasonable cost. Although flow cytometry is a powerful tool for evaluating many sperm attributes, it cannot evaluate all of the attributes a sperm cell requires to fertilize an oocyte. Therefore, laboratory assays are also being developed to evaluate the ability of sperm: (1) to bind to the oocyte, by evaluating the ability of sperm to bind to the perivitelline membrane of the hen egg in vitro; (2) to undergo an acrosome reaction in vitro, after treatment with membrane destabilizing compounds; and (3) to penetrate oocytes in vitro. When data from multiple sperm assays are used, higher correlations with the fertilizing potential of a semen sample is achieved. For example, in a study conducted utilizing five stallions, the percentage of motile sperm in semen samples correlated poorly with fertility (r(2)=0.22), however, when data for sperm motility, viability and penetration rates into zona-free hamster oocytes were utilized together, these data explained 72% of the differences in the fertility of the stallions (r=0.849; [Theriogenology 46 (1996) 559]). Armed with a battery of tests, which evaluate many different sperm attributes, researchers should be able to more accurately estimate the fertilizing potential of semen samples.
多年来,科学家们一直试图开发能够准确预测精液样本受精能力的实验室检测方法。然而,由于该问题的复杂性,这一目标已被证明难以实现,而且很可能非常难以达成。部分问题源于精子使卵子受精必须具备的多种特性,以及实验室检测方法如何能同时评估所有这些特性。样本中活动精子的百分比是最常用于评估精液质量的指标。然而,该检测方法与精液样本的受精能力并没有高度相关性。活动检测与生育能力相关性不佳的一个原因是,我们仅评估了精子使卵母细胞受精必须具备的多种特性中的一种。测量多种精子特性的问题之一是所需的时间和成本。使用流式细胞术检测,可以同时测量精子细胞的多种特性,包括细胞活力、顶体完整性和线粒体功能。此外,还可以使用流式细胞术测量精子发生获能和顶体反应的能力,以及精子的染色体完整性。流式细胞术使我们能够在不到1分钟的时间内,以合理的成本评估50,000个精子。尽管流式细胞术是评估多种精子特性的强大工具,但它无法评估精子使卵母细胞受精所需的所有特性。因此,也在开发实验室检测方法来评估精子的以下能力:(1)通过评估精子在体外与母鸡卵的卵周膜结合的能力来评估其与卵母细胞结合的能力;(2)在用膜去稳定化化合物处理后,评估精子在体外发生顶体反应的能力;(3)评估精子在体外穿透卵母细胞的能力。当使用来自多种精子检测的数据时,与精液样本的受精潜力有更高的相关性。例如,在一项对五匹种马进行的研究中,精液样本中活动精子的百分比与生育能力的相关性很差(r(2)=0.22),然而,当将精子活力、活力和穿透无透明带仓鼠卵母细胞的速率数据一起使用时,这些数据解释了种马生育能力差异的72%(r=0.849;[《兽医学》46 (1996) 559])。有了一系列评估多种不同精子特性的检测方法,研究人员应该能够更准确地估计精液样本的受精潜力。