Suppr超能文献

探测欺骗:范围与局限

Detecting deception: the scope and limits.

作者信息

Sip Kamila E, Roepstorff Andreas, McGregor William, Frith Chris D

机构信息

Center for Functional Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, Building 30, DK-8000 Arhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Feb;12(2):48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.008.

Abstract

With the increasing interest in the neuroimaging of deception and its commercial application, there is a need to pay more attention to methodology. The weakness of studying deception in an experimental setting has been discussed intensively for over half a century. However, even though much effort has been put into their development, paradigms are still inadequate. The problems that bedevilled the old technology have not been eliminated by the new. Advances will only be possible if experiments are designed that take account of the intentions of the subject and the context in which these occur.

摘要

随着人们对欺骗行为的神经成像及其商业应用的兴趣日益浓厚,有必要更加关注研究方法。在实验环境中研究欺骗行为的弱点已经被深入讨论了半个多世纪。然而,尽管在这些方法的开发上投入了大量精力,但范式仍然不够完善。困扰旧技术的问题并没有被新技术消除。只有设计出考虑到受试者意图及其发生背景的实验,才有可能取得进展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验