Jin Peipei, Gao Ruixiang, Zhong Weifang, Gu Huang, Zhong Luojin, Wu Jun, Mo Ce, Mo Lei
School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China.
Guangdong Justice Police Vocational College, Guangzhou, 510520, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 13;15(1):1835. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85926-y.
This study investigated whether honesty is a stable trait or varies depending on situational factors. Using a coin flip guessing paradigm with monetary rewards, 33 participants completed trials with rewards ranging from 0.01 to 3 yuan. Modeling of behavioral data showed individuals have varying "honesty thresholds" where they switch from honest to dishonest behavior. EEG analysis revealed increased P300 amplitude when resisting greater monetary temptation, and individuals with higher honesty thresholds had lower P300 amplitudes for the same rewards. A late positive component indicated greater cognitive conflict when the reward amount neared an individual's honesty threshold. These findings challenge the conception of honesty as a stable trait, instead demonstrating it varies based on contextual factors like reward size. Computational modeling and EEG provide insight into the cognitive processes underlying contextual shifts in honest behavior.
本研究调查了诚实是一种稳定的特质还是会因情境因素而变化。通过使用带有金钱奖励的抛硬币猜测范式,33名参与者完成了奖励从0.01元到3元不等的试验。行为数据建模表明,个体有不同的“诚实阈值”,在这个阈值处他们会从诚实行为转变为不诚实行为。脑电图分析显示,在抵制更大金钱诱惑时,P300波幅增加,对于相同奖励,诚实阈值较高的个体P300波幅较低。一个晚期正成分表明,当奖励金额接近个体的诚实阈值时,认知冲突更大。这些发现挑战了将诚实视为稳定特质的观念,相反,证明了它会根据奖励大小等情境因素而变化。计算建模和脑电图为诚实行为情境转变背后的认知过程提供了见解。