Kern M, Neikes M J, Strub J R
Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, Freiburg i. Br.
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1991 Nov;46(11):758-61.
The tensile bond strengths of six different resin-bonding-systems to the aluminium oxide ceramic In-Ceram were tested. The samples were stored in artificial saliva (37 degrees C) up to 150 days and thermocycled (5 degrees-55 degrees C, 18,750 cycles). After sandblasting or silicoating of In-Ceram the tensile bond strength of the modified Bis-GMA resin Panavia-Ex showed no significant changes within this observation period. Using the conventional Bis-GMA resin Microfill-pontic, silicoating In-Ceram with the Rocatec-system resulted in a better bond strength than the use of a silane. The used etching procedure with boiling 70% sulphuric acid was proven to be unsuitable for a long-term stable bond.
测试了六种不同树脂粘结系统与氧化铝陶瓷In-Ceram的拉伸粘结强度。将样品在人工唾液（37摄氏度）中保存长达150天，并进行热循环（5摄氏度至55摄氏度，18750次循环）。在对In-Ceram进行喷砂或硅涂层处理后，改性双酚A缩水甘油醚树脂Panavia-Ex的拉伸粘结强度在该观察期内无显著变化。使用传统的双酚A缩水甘油醚树脂Microfill-桥体，用Rocatec系统对In-Ceram进行硅涂层处理比使用硅烷具有更好的粘结强度。事实证明，使用沸腾的70%硫酸进行蚀刻的方法不适用于长期稳定的粘结。
