Brown Rupert, González Roberto, Zagefka Hanna, Manzi Jorge, Cehajic Sabina
Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jan;94(1):75-90. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.75.
Three studies examined the hypothesis that collective guilt and shame have different consequences for reparation. In 2 longitudinal studies, the ingroup was nonindigenous Chileans (Study 1: N = 124/120, lag = 8 weeks; Study 2: N = 247/137, lag = 6 months), and the outgroup was Chile's largest indigenous group, the Mapuche. In both studies, it was found that collective guilt predicted reparation attitudes longitudinally. Collective shame had only cross-sectional associations with reparation and no direct longitudinal effects. In Study 2, collective shame moderated the longitudinal effects of collective guilt such that the effects of guilt were stronger for low-shame respondents. In Study 3 (N = 193 nonindigenous Chileans), the cross-sectional relationships among guilt, shame, and reparation attitudes were replicated. The relationship between shame and reparation attitudes was mediated by a desire to improve the ingroup's reputation.
三项研究检验了集体内疚和羞耻感对赔偿有不同影响这一假设。在两项纵向研究中,内群体是智利非原住民(研究1:N = 124/120,时间间隔 = 8周;研究2:N = 247/137,时间间隔 = 6个月),外群体是智利最大的原住民群体马普切人。在这两项研究中,均发现集体内疚可纵向预测赔偿态度。集体羞耻感仅与赔偿存在横断面关联,并无直接的纵向影响。在研究2中,集体羞耻感调节了集体内疚的纵向影响,以至于对于低羞耻感的受访者而言,内疚感的影响更强。在研究3(193名智利非原住民)中,重复了内疚、羞耻感和赔偿态度之间的横断面关系。羞耻感与赔偿态度之间的关系是通过改善内群体声誉的愿望来介导的。