Hannig M, Rahlf B, Schlichting B
Zentrum Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel.
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1991 Sep;46(9):618-20.
This in vitro study assessed the marginal behavior of the "Kulzer"-inlay using two different resin luting agents (Adhesive cement resp. Tulux-Cem). SEM-evaluation after combined mechanical and thermal loading revealed significant differences in the marginal seal of the inlays depending on the luting composite resin used. "Kulzer"-inlays luted with Adhesive cement showed of rate a excellent margins of more than 90% even after in vitro load application, while the rate of perfect margins were less than 80% for "Kulzer"-inlays inserted with Tulux-Cem.
这项体外研究使用两种不同的树脂粘结剂（粘结水门汀和图卢克斯水门汀）评估了“库尔泽”嵌体的边缘性能。在机械和热联合加载后的扫描电子显微镜评估显示，根据所使用的粘结复合树脂不同，嵌体的边缘密封性存在显著差异。用粘结水门汀粘结的“库尔泽”嵌体，即使在体外加载后，其边缘优良率仍超过90%，而用图卢克斯水门汀粘结的“库尔泽”嵌体，完美边缘率不到80%。
