Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R
Polyclinic for Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):60D-76D.
To describe the potential of adhesive luting procedures with respect to (1) material characteristics and classifications, (2) film thickness, (3) overhang control, (4) bonding to different inlay materials, (5) adhesion to tooth substrates and the problem of hypersensitivities, (6) wear of luting composites, and (7) clinical performance.
A literature review of relevant studies of various in vitro and in vivo studies enables an overview of possibilities and limitations of adhesively luted indirect restorations.
(1) Resin-based composites are the material of choice for adhesive luting. Both material properties and wear behavior of fine particle hybrid-type resin-based composites are superior to other materials. The use of compomers is questionable due to hygroscopic expansion and possible crack formation as proven for IPS Empress caps in vitro and in vivo. (2) Recent luting cements exhibit excellent flow characteristics with mean film thicknesses ranging between 8 microm and 21 microm. The ultrasonic insertion technique is recommended for viscous luting composites or conventional restorative composites utilizing their thixotropic properties. (3) For successful overhang control, good fit of the restoration (during luting) and high radiopacity of the cement (after luting) are indispensable. Overhang control is estimated easier when the ultrasonic insertion technique is applied. (4) The pre-treatments of ceramic inlays using hydrofluoric acid or silica coating result in effective bonding; for pre-treatment of resin-based composite inlays, silica coating is promising as well. (5) Bonding to enamel and dentin is proven clinically acceptable, but it should be performed with multi-step systems providing separate primers and bonding agents producing a perfect internal seal with almost no hypersensitivities. Dual-cured multi-step bonding agents provide the most promising potential. (6) The viscosity and filler content of the resin composite used for luting does not influence the wear characteristics within the marginal luting area in vivo. However, the ultrasonic insertion technique involving high viscosity materials provides enhanced handling characteristics for luting of tooth-colored inlays. (7) Clinical results with tooth-colored inlays and veneers are promising over periods of up to 10 yrs, including use in severely destroyed teeth.
描述粘结固位程序在以下方面的潜力:(1)材料特性与分类;(2)薄膜厚度;(3)悬突控制;(4)与不同嵌体材料的粘结;(5)与牙体组织的粘结及过敏问题;(6)粘结性复合树脂的磨损;(7)临床性能。
对各种体外和体内研究的相关文献进行综述,以概述粘结固位间接修复体的可能性和局限性。
(1)树脂基复合材料是粘结固位的首选材料。细颗粒混合型树脂基复合材料的材料性能和磨损行为均优于其他材料。由于吸湿性膨胀和可能形成裂纹,如IPS Empress全瓷冠在体外和体内试验所证实的那样,复合树脂粘结剂的使用存在疑问。(2)近期的粘结水门汀表现出优异的流动性,平均薄膜厚度在8微米至21微米之间。对于粘性粘结复合树脂或利用其触变性的传统修复性复合树脂,建议采用超声插入技术。(3)为成功控制悬突,修复体(在粘结时)的良好贴合度和水门汀(粘结后)的高射线不透性是必不可少的。应用超声插入技术时,悬突控制更容易估计。(4)使用氢氟酸或二氧化硅涂层对陶瓷嵌体进行预处理可实现有效粘结;对于树脂基复合嵌体的预处理,二氧化硅涂层也很有前景。(5)粘结至釉质和牙本质在临床上已被证明是可接受的,但应使用多步骤系统进行,该系统提供单独的底漆和粘结剂,可产生几乎无过敏的完美内部封闭。双重固化多步骤粘结剂具有最有前景的潜力。(6)用于粘结的树脂复合材料的粘度和填料含量在体内边缘粘结区域内不影响磨损特性。然而,涉及高粘度材料的超声插入技术为牙齿颜色嵌体的粘结提供了更好的操作特性。(7)牙齿颜色嵌体和贴面的临床结果在长达10年的时间内很有前景, 包括用于严重破坏的牙齿。