Grober Ellen, Hall Charles, Lipton Richard B, Teresi Jeanne A
Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York 10467, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Feb;56(2):206-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01553.x. Epub 2007 Dec 27.
To determine whether the Alzheimer's Disease Screen for Primary Care (ADS-PC) is more sensitive to early dementia than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and whether it has as high a misclassification rate in minority patients and patients with limited education.
Cross-sectional validation study.
Urban geriatric primary care practice.
Three hundred sixteen African-American and Caucasian patients, including 55 patients with early dementia (Clinical Demential Rating of 0.5).
The ADS-PC is a two-stage strategy for identifying early dementia that consists of a brief high-sensitivity dementia screen, applied to all patients aged 65 and older, and a second stage to identify memory impairment, applied to patients who fail the first stage. Differences in the sensitivities or specificities of the ADS-PC and the MMSE were evaluated using the McNemar test.
Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to examine differences in the operating characteristics of the ADS-PC across a range of cutscores. When the specificities of both tests were equated (0.90), the sensitivities were significantly different (ADS-PC, 0.75; MMSE, 0.56). The MMSE failed to identify five times as many cases of dementia as the ADS-PC. When the sensitivities were equated, the specificities differed significantly (ADS-PC, 0.95; MMSE, 0.73). The MMSE misclassified five times as many noncases as the ADS-PC. This pattern of significantly higher sensitivity and specificity for the ADS-PC than for the MMSE was repeated in the results according to race and for individuals with high school or more education but not in individuals with less education.
The ADS-PC outperformed the MMSE in identifying early dementia in a racially and educationally diverse primary care cohort.
确定初级保健中的阿尔茨海默病筛查(ADS-PC)对早期痴呆症是否比简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)更敏感,以及在少数族裔患者和受教育程度有限的患者中其错误分类率是否同样高。
横断面验证研究。
城市老年初级保健机构。
316名非裔美国人和白人患者,其中包括55名早期痴呆症患者(临床痴呆评定为0.5)。
ADS-PC是一种用于识别早期痴呆症的两阶段策略,包括对所有65岁及以上患者进行的简短高灵敏度痴呆筛查,以及对第一阶段筛查未通过的患者进行的第二阶段记忆障碍识别。使用McNemar检验评估ADS-PC和MMSE在敏感性或特异性方面的差异。
采用受试者工作特征曲线来检验ADS-PC在一系列临界值下的操作特征差异。当两种测试的特异性相等(0.90)时,敏感性存在显著差异(ADS-PC为0.75;MMSE为0.56)。MMSE未能识别出的痴呆症病例数量是ADS-PC的五倍。当敏感性相等时,特异性存在显著差异(ADS-PC为0.95;MMSE为0.73)。MMSE错误分类的非病例数量是ADS-PC的五倍。根据种族以及高中及以上学历个体的结果,ADS-PC的敏感性和特异性显著高于MMSE的这种模式再次出现,但在受教育程度较低的个体中并非如此。
在一个种族和教育背景多样的初级保健队列中,ADS-PC在识别早期痴呆症方面优于MMSE。