• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性的吸引力能为精液质量提供线索吗?

Does attractiveness in men provide clues to semen quality?

作者信息

Peters M, Rhodes G, Simmons L W

机构信息

Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.

出版信息

J Evol Biol. 2008 Mar;21(2):572-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01477.x. Epub 2008 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01477.x
PMID:18179518
Abstract

The psychological mechanisms underlying attractiveness judgements in humans are thought to be evolved adaptations for finding a high quality mate. The phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis proposes that females obtain reliable information on male fertility from male expression of sexual traits. A previous study of Spanish men reported that facial attractiveness was positively associated with semen quality. We aimed to determine whether this effect was widespread by examining a large sample of Australian men. We also extended our study to determine whether cues to semen quality are provided by components of attractiveness: masculinity, averageness and symmetry. Each male participant was photographed and provided a semen sample that was analyzed for sperm morphology, motility and concentration. Two independent sets of women rated the male photographs for attractiveness, and three further sets of 12 women rated the photographs for masculinity, symmetry or averageness. We found no significant correlations between semen quality parameters and attractiveness or attractive traits. Although male physical attractiveness may signal aspects of mate quality, our results suggest that phenotype-linked cues to male fertility may not be general across human populations.

摘要

人类吸引力判断背后的心理机制被认为是为寻找高质量配偶而进化出的适应性特征。表型关联生育力假说提出,女性可从男性性特征的表现中获取有关男性生育力的可靠信息。之前一项针对西班牙男性的研究报告称,面部吸引力与精液质量呈正相关。我们旨在通过研究大量澳大利亚男性样本,确定这种效应是否普遍存在。我们还扩展了研究,以确定精液质量线索是否由吸引力的组成部分提供:阳刚之气、普通程度和对称性。为每位男性参与者拍摄照片,并提供一份精液样本,对其精子形态、活力和浓度进行分析。两组独立的女性对男性照片的吸引力进行评分,另有三组每组12名女性对照片的阳刚之气、对称性或普通程度进行评分。我们发现精液质量参数与吸引力或吸引人的特征之间没有显著相关性。尽管男性的身体吸引力可能标志着配偶质量的某些方面,但我们的结果表明,与男性生育力相关的表型线索可能并非在所有人群中都普遍存在。

相似文献

1
Does attractiveness in men provide clues to semen quality?男性的吸引力能为精液质量提供线索吗?
J Evol Biol. 2008 Mar;21(2):572-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01477.x. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
2
Male facial attractiveness and masculinity may provide sex- and culture-independent cues to semen quality.男性面部吸引力和男子气概可能为精液质量提供与性别和文化无关的线索。
J Evol Biol. 2014 Sep;27(9):1930-8. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12446. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
3
Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness?平均水平还是对称性:哪一个对面部吸引力更重要?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Jun;131(2):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
4
Genetic diversity revealed in human faces.人类面部揭示的遗传多样性。
Evolution. 2008 Oct;62(10):2473-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00478.x. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
5
Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle.对面部对称性的偏好会在月经周期中发生变化。
Biol Psychol. 2007 Oct;76(3):209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Aug 22.
6
Sperm traits and male fertility in natural populations.自然种群中的精子特征与雄性生育力
Reproduction. 2007 Jul;134(1):19-29. doi: 10.1530/REP-07-0143.
7
Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness.面部平均性和两性异形对面部吸引力判断的影响。
Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(8):862-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
8
Semen quality and sperm functional parameters in fertile Indian men.印度生育男性的精液质量和精子功能参数
Andrologia. 2006 Feb;38(1):20-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2006.00685.x.
9
The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.面部美的进化心理学
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199-226. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208.
10
Perceived health contributes to the attractiveness of facial symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism.感知到的健康状况有助于提升面部对称性、普通性和两性异形的吸引力。
Perception. 2007;36(8):1244-52. doi: 10.1068/p5712.

引用本文的文献

1
Facial attractiveness and preference of sexual dimorphism: A comparison across five populations.面部吸引力与两性异形偏好:五个群体的比较
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Jul 2;3:e38. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.33. eCollection 2021.
2
No Evidence for a Relationship between Intelligence and Ejaculate Quality.没有证据表明智力与精液质量之间存在关系。
Evol Psychol. 2020 Jul-Sep;18(3):1474704920960450. doi: 10.1177/1474704920960450.
3
Facial Shape Analysis Identifies Valid Cues to Aspects of Physiological Health in Caucasian, Asian, and African Populations.
面部形状分析识别出白种人、亚洲人和非洲人群生理健康方面的有效线索。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 30;8:1883. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01883. eCollection 2017.
4
Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.精子数量的时间趋势:一项系统评价与Meta回归分析
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Nov 1;23(6):646-659. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx022.
5
Predictors of facial attractiveness and health in humans.人类面部吸引力和健康的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 3;7:39731. doi: 10.1038/srep39731.
6
Infertility etiologies are genetically and clinically linked with other diseases in single meta-diseases.不孕症病因在单一元疾病中与其他疾病存在遗传和临床联系。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Apr 15;13:31. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0029-9.
7
Geometric facial gender scoring: objectivity of perception.面部几何性别评分:感知的客观性。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e99483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099483. eCollection 2014.
8
Voice pitch influences perceptions of sexual infidelity.嗓音音高会影响对性不忠行为的认知。
Evol Psychol. 2011 Feb 28;9(1):64-78. doi: 10.1177/147470491100900109.
9
Low pitched voices are perceived as masculine and attractive but do they predict semen quality in men?低沉的嗓音被认为具有男子气概和吸引力,但它们能预测男性的精液质量吗?
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e29271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029271. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
10
Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: Evidence from the late 20 century United States.人类的身体吸引力与生殖成功率:来自20世纪后期美国的证据。
Evol Hum Behav. 2009 Sep 1;30(5):342-350. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.006.