Suppr超能文献

CT结肠成像的计算机辅助检测:观察者培训的增量效益。

Computer-aided detection for CT colonography: incremental benefit of observer training.

作者信息

Taylor S A, Burling D, Roddie M, Honeyfield L, McQuillan J, Bassett P, Halligan S

机构信息

Department of Specialist Radiology, University College Hospital, Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2008 Mar;81(963):180-6. doi: 10.1259/bjr/93375459. Epub 2008 Jan 7.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incremental effect of focused training on observer performance when using computer-assisted detection (CAD) software to interpret CT colonography (CTC). Six radiologists who were relatively inexperienced with CTC interpretation underwent 1 day of focused training before reading 20 patient datasets with the assistance of CAD software (ColonCAR 1.3, Medicsight PLC). Sensitivity, specificity and interpretation times were determined and compared with previous performance when reading the same datasets but without the benefit of focused training, using the binomial exact test and Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Per-polyp sensitivity improved after training by 18% overall (95% confidence interval (CI): 14-24%, p<0.001) and was greatest for polyps of 6-9 mm (26%, 95% CI: 18-34%, p<0.001). Absolute sensitivity was 23% (9-36%), 51% (33-71%) and 74% (44-100%) for polyps of <or=5 mm, 6-9 mm and >or=10 mm, respectively. Specificity fell significantly after focused training (median of 5.5 false positives per 20 datasets (interquartile range (IQR): 4-6) post-training vs median of 2.5 (IQR: 1-5) pre-training, p = 0.03). Interpretation time also increased significantly after training (from a median of 9.3 min (IQR: 9.3-14.5 min) to a median of 17.1 min (IQR: 15.4-19.4 min), p = 0.03). In conclusion, one day of training increases observer polyp sensitivity when using CAD for CTC at the expense of increased reporting time and reduction in specificity.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查在使用计算机辅助检测(CAD)软件解读CT结肠成像(CTC)时,针对性训练对观察者表现的增量效应。六位对CTC解读经验相对不足的放射科医生在借助CAD软件(ColonCAR 1.3,Medicsight PLC)阅读20例患者数据集之前,接受了为期1天的针对性训练。确定了敏感度、特异度和解读时间,并与之前在阅读相同数据集但未接受针对性训练时的表现进行比较,采用二项式精确检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验。训练后,每息肉敏感度总体提高了18%(95%置信区间(CI):14 - 24%,p<0.001),对于6 - 9毫米的息肉提高幅度最大(26%,95% CI:18 - 34%,p<0.001)。对于直径≤5毫米、6 - 9毫米和≥10毫米的息肉,绝对敏感度分别为23%(9 - 36%)、51%(33 - 71%)和74%(44 - 100%)。针对性训练后特异度显著下降(训练后每20个数据集的假阳性中位数为5.5(四分位间距(IQR):4 - 6),而训练前为2.5(IQR:1 - 5),p = 0.03)。训练后解读时间也显著增加(从中位数9.3分钟(IQR:9.3 - 14.5分钟)增至中位数17.1分钟(IQR:15.4 - 19.4分钟),p = 0.03)。总之,为期一天的训练在使用CAD进行CTC解读时提高了观察者对息肉的敏感度,但代价是报告时间增加和特异度降低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验