Paineau Damien L, Beaufils François, Boulier Alain, Cassuto Dominique-Adèle, Chwalow Judith, Combris Pierre, Couet Charles, Jouret Béatrice, Lafay Lionel, Laville Martine, Mahe Sylvain, Ricour Claude, Romon Monique, Simon Chantal, Tauber Maïté, Valensi Paul, Chapalain Véronique, Zourabichvili Othar, Bornet Francis
Nutri-Health, Immeuble Ampère, 8 rue Eugène et Armand Peugeot, 92566 Rueil-Malmaison Cedex, France.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Jan;162(1):34-43. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.2.
To test the hypothesis that family dietary coaching would improve nutritional intakes and weight control in free-living (noninstitutionalized) children and parents.
Randomized controlled trial.
Fifty-four elementary schools in Paris, France.
One thousand thirteen children (mean age, 7.7 years) and 1013 parents (mean age, 40.5 years).
Families were randomly assigned to group A (advised to reduce fat and to increase complex carbohydrate intake), group B (advised to reduce both fat and sugar and to increase complex carbohydrate intake), or a control group (given no advice). Groups A and B received monthly phone counseling and Internet-based monitoring for 8 months.
Changes in nutritional intake, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), fat mass, physical activity, blood indicators, and quality of life.
Compared with controls, participants in the intervention groups achieved their nutritional targets for fat intake and to a smaller extent for sugar and complex carbohydrate intake, leading to a decrease in energy intake (children, P < .001; parents, P = .02). Mean changes in body mass index were similar among children (group A, + 0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI], - 0.06 to 0.16; group B, + 0.10, 95% CI, - 0.03 to 0.23; control group, + 0.13, 95% CI, 0.04-0.22; P = .45), but differed in parents (group A, + 0.13, 95% CI, - 0.01 to 0.27; group B, - 0.02, 95% CI, - 0.14 to 0.11; control group, + 0.24, 95% CI, 0.13-0.34; P = .001), with a significant difference between group B and the control group (P = .01).
Family dietary coaching improves nutritional intake in free-living children and parents, with beneficial effects on weight control in parents. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00456911.
检验家庭饮食指导能否改善非寄宿制儿童及其父母的营养摄入和体重控制情况这一假设。
随机对照试验。
法国巴黎的54所小学。
1013名儿童(平均年龄7.7岁)和1013名家长(平均年龄40.5岁)。
家庭被随机分为A组(建议减少脂肪摄入并增加复合碳水化合物摄入量)、B组(建议减少脂肪和糖的摄入并增加复合碳水化合物摄入量)或对照组(未给予建议)。A组和B组接受为期8个月的每月一次电话咨询和基于互联网的监测。
营养摄入、体重指数(计算方法为体重千克数除以身高米数的平方)、脂肪量、身体活动、血液指标和生活质量的变化。
与对照组相比,干预组参与者实现了脂肪摄入的营养目标,在一定程度上也实现了糖和复合碳水化合物摄入目标,从而导致能量摄入减少(儿童,P < 0.001;家长,P = 0.02)。儿童的体重指数平均变化相似(A组,+0.05,95%置信区间[CI],-0.06至0.16;B组,+0.10,95%CI,-0.03至0.23;对照组,+0.13,95%CI,0.04 - 0.22;P = 0.45),但家长的情况有所不同(A组,+0.13,95%CI,-0.01至0.27;B组,-0.02,95%CI,-0.14至0.11;对照组,+0.24,95%CI,0.13 - 0.34;P = 0.001),B组与对照组之间存在显著差异(P = 0.01)。
家庭饮食指导可改善非寄宿制儿童及其父母的营养摄入,对家长的体重控制有有益影响。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00456911。