实证数据与研究风险的可接受性：关于慈善参与标准的评论 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Empirical data and the acceptability of research risk: a commentary on the charitable participation standard.

作者信息

Reynolds William W, Nelson Robert M

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Jan;162(1):88-90. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.4.

DOI:10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.4

PMID:18180419

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Empirical data and the acceptability of research risk: a commentary on the charitable participation standard.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Jan;162(1):88-90. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.4.

Children's and their parents' views on facing research risks for the benefit of others.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Jan;162(1):9-14. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.3.

Justifying pediatric research not expected to benefit child subjects.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):42-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634949.

A new justification for pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):23-31. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634482.

Consent to pediatric research: a couple of distinctions.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):37-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634948.

A more persuasive justification for pediatric research.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):44-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.638038.

On justifying pediatric research without the prospect of clinical benefit.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):32-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.635918.

On Wendler's new justification for pediatric research.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):40-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.635837.

Why even inappropriate parental consent might be enough to justify minimal risk pediatric research without clinical benefit.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):35-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.635834.

Twenty-five years of therapeutic misconception.

Hastings Cent Rep. 2008 Mar-Apr;38(2):6; author reply 6-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Empirical data and the acceptability of research risk: a commentary on the charitable participation standard.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Jan;162(1):88-90. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.4.

Children's and their parents' views on facing research risks for the benefit of others.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Jan;162(1):9-14. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.3.

Justifying pediatric research not expected to benefit child subjects.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):42-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634949.

A new justification for pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):23-31. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634482.

Consent to pediatric research: a couple of distinctions.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):37-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634948.

A more persuasive justification for pediatric research.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):44-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.638038.

On justifying pediatric research without the prospect of clinical benefit.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):32-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.635918.

On Wendler's new justification for pediatric research.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):40-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.635837.

Why even inappropriate parental consent might be enough to justify minimal risk pediatric research without clinical benefit.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):35-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.635834.

Twenty-five years of therapeutic misconception.

Hastings Cent Rep. 2008 Mar-Apr;38(2):6; author reply 6-7.

Empirical data and the acceptability of research risk: a commentary on the charitable participation standard.

作者信息

Reynolds William W, Nelson Robert M

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Jan;162(1):88-90. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.4.

DOI:10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.4

PMID:18180419

Abstract

摘要