相似文献
1
Why even inappropriate parental consent might be enough to justify minimal risk pediatric research without clinical benefit.
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):35-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.635834.
2
On justifying pediatric research without the prospect of clinical benefit.
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):32-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.635918.
3
Consent to pediatric research: a couple of distinctions.
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):37-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634948.
4
Justifying pediatric research not expected to benefit child subjects.
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):42-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634949.
5
A more persuasive justification for pediatric research.
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):44-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.638038.
6
On Wendler's new justification for pediatric research.
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):40-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.635837.
7
The context of clinical research and its ethical relevance: the COMPAS trial as a case study.
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):39-40. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.635836.
8
A new justification for pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit.
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):23-31. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634482.
9
Body matters: rethinking the ethical acceptability of non-beneficial clinical research with children.
Med Health Care Philos. 2015 Aug;18(3):421-31. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9616-3.
10
Regulating "higher risk, no direct benefit" studies in minors.
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Jun;11(6):29-31. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.566669.
Zotero 插件