e Silva Yerkes Pereira, Gomez Renato Santiago, Marcatto Juliana de Oliveira, Maximo Thadeu Alves, Barbosa Rosilu Ferreira, e Silva Ana Cristina Simões
Department of Anesthesiology and Neonatology, Lifecenter Hospital, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Feb;18(2):176-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2007.02378.x.
Morphine is one of the most commonly used drugs for sedation and analgesia during mechanical ventilation, but its pharmacological profile has limitations, such as prolonged duration of action, especially in premature neonates. Because of its very short context-sensitive half-time, remifentanil has rapid onset and quickly decreases in plasma concentration after interrupting administration. The aim of the present study was to compare a continuous infusion of remifentanil and morphine during mechanical ventilation of premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).
Twenty premature neonates (28-34 weeks) with RDS were randomized in a prospective double-blinded study to receive either a continuous infusion of morphine (n = 10) or remifentanil (n = 10) for mechanical ventilation. The length of time to awaken and extubate the neonate after interrupting opioid administration was recorded. We also recorded stress (COMFORT scale), pain response [Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS)], hemodynamic and ventilatory variables as well as adverse effects secondary to infusion of the specific opioid.
After terminating infusion, the length of time required to awaken and extubate the neonates was 18.9- and 12.1-fold longer, respectively, in the morphine group than in the remifentanil group. Both groups produced good quality sedation and analgesia as evaluated by the NIPS and COMFORT scores. No major side effects were observed.
Our results show an interesting potential for the use of remifentanil in premature neonates. Remifentanil allowed an adequate level of sedation and analgesia as well as rapid recovery after discontinuation. However, further properly designed clinical trials are needed before it can be generally recommended.
吗啡是机械通气期间最常用的镇静和镇痛药物之一,但其药理学特性存在局限性,例如作用持续时间延长,尤其是在早产儿中。瑞芬太尼因其极短的上下文敏感半衰期,起效迅速,停药后血浆浓度迅速下降。本研究的目的是比较在患有呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的早产儿机械通气期间持续输注瑞芬太尼和吗啡的效果。
20例患有RDS的早产儿(28 - 34周)在一项前瞻性双盲研究中被随机分组,分别接受吗啡持续输注(n = 10)或瑞芬太尼持续输注(n = 10)用于机械通气。记录停用阿片类药物后新生儿苏醒和拔管的时间长度。我们还记录了应激(舒适量表)、疼痛反应[新生儿婴儿疼痛量表(NIPS)]、血流动力学和通气变量以及特定阿片类药物输注引起的不良反应。
输注结束后,吗啡组新生儿苏醒和拔管所需时间分别比瑞芬太尼组长18.9倍和12.1倍。根据NIPS和舒适评分评估,两组均产生了良好质量的镇静和镇痛效果。未观察到重大副作用。
我们的结果显示了瑞芬太尼在早产儿中使用的有趣潜力。瑞芬太尼能提供足够水平的镇静和镇痛,停药后恢复迅速。然而,在普遍推荐之前还需要进一步设计合理的临床试验。