• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国头颈部癌症生存的社会经济差异:基于人群癌症登记数据的因果中介分析。

Socioeconomic disparities in head and neck cancer survival in Germany: a causal mediation analysis using population-based cancer registry data.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Services Research Group, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometry, and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Strasse 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 May;147(5):1325-1334. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03537-2. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00432-021-03537-2
PMID:33569714
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8021523/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite recent improvements in cancer treatment in Germany, a marked difference in cancer survival based on socioeconomic factors persists. We aim to quantify the effect of socioeconomic inequality on head and neck cancer (HNC) survival.

METHODS

Information on 20,821 HNC patients diagnosed in 2009-2013 was routinely collected by German population-based cancer registries. Socioeconomic inequality was defined by the German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation. The Cox proportional regression and relative survival analysis measured the survival disparity according to level of socioeconomic deprivation with respective confidence intervals (CI). A causal mediation analysis was conducted to quantify the effect of socioeconomic deprivation mediated through medical care, stage at diagnosis, and treatment on HNC survival.

RESULTS

The most socioeconomically deprived patients were found to have the highest hazard of dying when compared to the most affluent (Hazard Ratio: 1.25, 95% CI 1.17-1.34). The most deprived patients also had the worst 5-year age-adjusted relative survival (50.8%, 95% CI 48.5-53.0). Our mediation analysis showed that most of the effect of deprivation on survival was mediated through differential stage at diagnosis during the first 6 months after HNC diagnosis. As follow-up time increased, medical care, stage at diagnosis, and treatment played no role in mediating the effect of deprivation on survival.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the survival disparity between affluent and deprived HNC patients in Germany. Considering data limitations, our results suggest that, within six months after HNC diagnosis, the elimination of differences in stage at diagnosis could reduce survival inequalities.

摘要

目的

尽管德国在癌症治疗方面最近有所改善,但基于社会经济因素的癌症生存率仍存在显著差异。我们旨在量化社会经济不平等对头颈部癌症(HNC)生存率的影响。

方法

通过德国基于人群的癌症登记处常规收集了 2009 年至 2013 年间诊断的 20821 例 HNC 患者的信息。社会经济不平等程度由德国社会经济剥夺指数定义。Cox 比例风险回归和相对生存分析根据社会经济剥夺程度测量了相应的置信区间(CI)的生存差异。进行因果中介分析,以量化社会经济剥夺通过医疗保健、诊断时的分期和治疗对 HNC 生存的影响。

结果

与最富裕的患者相比,最贫困的患者被发现死亡的风险最高(风险比:1.25,95%CI 1.17-1.34)。最贫困的患者也有最差的 5 年年龄调整相对生存率(50.8%,95%CI 48.5-53.0)。我们的中介分析表明,剥夺对生存的影响主要是通过 HNC 诊断后 6 个月内诊断分期的差异来介导的。随着随访时间的增加,医疗保健、诊断时的分期和治疗在中介剥夺对生存的影响方面没有作用。

结论

本研究证实了德国富裕和贫困 HNC 患者之间的生存差异。考虑到数据的局限性,我们的结果表明,在 HNC 诊断后六个月内,消除分期差异可以减少生存不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf6/11802016/910326ef976f/432_2021_3537_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf6/11802016/acc9dccda4ae/432_2021_3537_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf6/11802016/3d4f485bc99b/432_2021_3537_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf6/11802016/5f14ee27e3fd/432_2021_3537_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf6/11802016/910326ef976f/432_2021_3537_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf6/11802016/acc9dccda4ae/432_2021_3537_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf6/11802016/3d4f485bc99b/432_2021_3537_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf6/11802016/5f14ee27e3fd/432_2021_3537_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf6/11802016/910326ef976f/432_2021_3537_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic disparities in head and neck cancer survival in Germany: a causal mediation analysis using population-based cancer registry data.德国头颈部癌症生存的社会经济差异:基于人群癌症登记数据的因果中介分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 May;147(5):1325-1334. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03537-2. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
2
Socioeconomic disparities in endometrial cancer survival in Germany: a survival analysis using population-based cancer registry data.德国子宫内膜癌生存的社会经济差异:基于人群癌症登记数据的生存分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 May;148(5):1087-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03908-9. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
7
Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer.针对前列腺癌男性患者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 24;2013(12):CD008529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008529.pub3.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Do Patients of Different Levels of Affluence Receive Different Care for Pediatric Osteosarcomas? One Institution's Experience.不同富裕程度的患者在小儿骨肉瘤治疗上是否得到不同的护理?一家机构的经验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):748-758. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003299. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
10
Are There Differences in Performance Among Femoral Stem Brands Utilized in Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures?在用于治疗老年股骨颈骨折的非骨水泥半髋关节置换术中,不同品牌的股骨柄在性能上是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):253-264. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003222. Epub 2024 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological Factors Related to Treatment Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer.心理因素与头颈部癌症治疗结果的关系。
Adv Ther. 2024 Sep;41(9):3489-3519. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02945-3. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
2
Population based study on the progress in survival of primarily metastatic lung cancer patients in Germany.基于人群的研究:德国初诊转移性肺癌患者生存状况的进展
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 11;14(1):16005. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66307-3.
3
Psychosocial factors and patient and healthcare delays in large (class T3-T4) oral, oropharyngeal, and laryngeal carcinomas.

本文引用的文献

1
Area-Based Socioeconomic Inequalities in Colorectal Cancer Survival in Germany: Investigation Based on Population-Based Clinical Cancer Registration.德国结直肠癌生存方面基于地区的社会经济不平等:基于人群的临床癌症登记调查
Front Oncol. 2020 May 29;10:857. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00857. eCollection 2020.
2
Socioeconomic differences and lung cancer survival in Germany: Investigation based on population-based clinical cancer registration.德国的社会经济差异与肺癌生存:基于基于人群的临床癌症登记的调查。
Lung Cancer. 2020 Apr;142:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.01.021. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
3
Neighborhood deprivation and risk of head and neck cancer: A multilevel analysis from France.
大型(T3-T4 期)口腔、口咽和喉癌患者的社会心理因素及医疗延误。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):760. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12517-x.
4
Directed acyclic graphs in perioperative observational research-A systematic review and critique against best practice recommendations.定向无环图在围手术期观察性研究中的应用:系统评价及对最佳实践建议的批判。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 9;18(2):e0281259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281259. eCollection 2023.
5
German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation (GISD): Revision, update and applications.德国社会经济剥夺指数(GISD):修订、更新及应用
J Health Monit. 2022 Dec 9;7(Suppl 5):2-23. doi: 10.25646/10641. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Association of Household Income at Diagnosis With Financial Toxicity, Health Utility, and Survival in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.诊断时家庭收入与头颈部癌症患者的财务毒性、健康效用和生存的关联。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jan 1;149(1):63-70. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3755.
7
Socioeconomic disparities in endometrial cancer survival in Germany: a survival analysis using population-based cancer registry data.德国子宫内膜癌生存的社会经济差异:基于人群癌症登记数据的生存分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 May;148(5):1087-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03908-9. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
社区剥夺与头颈部癌症风险:来自法国的多层次分析。
Oral Oncol. 2017 Aug;71:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
4
Flexible Mediation Analysis With Multiple Mediators.具有多个中介变量的灵活中介分析
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jul 15;186(2):184-193. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx051.
5
Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Mortality, Incidence, and Survival in the United States, 1950-2014: Over Six Decades of Changing Patterns and Widening Inequalities.1950 - 2014年美国癌症死亡率、发病率及生存率的社会经济和种族/民族差异:六十多年来不断变化的模式与日益扩大的不平等
J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017:2819372. doi: 10.1155/2017/2819372. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
6
Impact of County-Level Socioeconomic Status on Oropharyngeal Cancer Survival in the United States.美国县级社会经济地位对口咽癌生存率的影响。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Apr;156(4):665-670. doi: 10.1177/0194599817691462. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
7
Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、区域和国家癌症发病率、死亡率、生命损失年数、失能生存年数以及 32 种癌症组别的伤残调整生命年数,1990 年至 2015 年:全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;3(4):524-548. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688.
8
A cohort study into head and neck cancer mortality in Belgium (2001-11): Are individual socioeconomic differences conditional on area deprivation?比利时头颈癌死亡率队列研究(2001 - 2011年):个体社会经济差异是否取决于地区贫困程度?
Oral Oncol. 2016 Oct;61:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.08.014. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
9
How much do tumor stage and treatment explain socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer survival? Applying causal mediation analysis to population-based data.肿瘤分期和治疗在多大程度上解释了乳腺癌生存方面的社会经济不平等?将因果中介分析应用于基于人群的数据。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;31(6):603-11. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0155-5. Epub 2016 May 10.
10
Socioeconomic and Other Demographic Disparities Predicting Survival among Head and Neck Cancer Patients.预测头颈癌患者生存率的社会经济及其他人口统计学差异
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 1;11(3):e0149886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149886. eCollection 2016.