Oxley Jennifer A, Congiu Melinda, Whelan Michelle, D'Elia Angelo, Charlton Judith
Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2007;51:81-96.
Using data from i) a simulated road-crossing task, ii) a battery of functional performance assessments, and iii) a survey of parents, some factors that may predict poor road-crossing skill were identified. Children aged between 6 and 10 years made road-crossing decisions in a simulated road environment in which time gap and speed of approaching vehicles were manipulated. Functional performance was examined using a range of tools designed to assess cognitive, perceptual, attentional and executive functioning. Parents also provided information on physical activity, exposure to traffic and road safety education. The results suggest that children predominantly made decisions based on distance gap and that younger children (6-7 year olds) were 12 times more likely than older children (8-10 year olds) to make critically incorrect (or unsafe) crossing decisions. Factors found to be associated with incorrect crossing decisions included lower perceptual, attentional, cognitive and executive performance, and independent travel. There were no gender differences associated with incorrect crossing decisions. This study has used a novel and safe way to identify 'at risk' groups of children and the findings have been used to develop and evaluate a practical educational and training program aimed at improving essential skills and strategies to cross roads safely amongst 'at risk' children.
i)一项模拟过马路任务;ii)一系列功能表现评估;以及iii)一项针对家长的调查,确定了一些可能预示过马路技能较差的因素。6至10岁的儿童在一个模拟道路环境中做出过马路决策,在该环境中,接近车辆的时间间隔和速度是可操控的。使用一系列旨在评估认知、感知、注意力和执行功能的工具来检查功能表现。家长还提供了有关身体活动、接触交通情况和道路安全教育的信息。结果表明,儿童主要根据距离间隔做出决策,并且年幼的儿童(6至7岁)做出严重错误(或不安全)过马路决策的可能性是年长儿童(8至10岁)的12倍。发现与错误过马路决策相关的因素包括较低的感知、注意力、认知和执行表现,以及独立出行。错误过马路决策不存在性别差异。本研究采用了一种新颖且安全的方法来识别儿童“风险”群体,研究结果已用于开发和评估一项实用的教育和培训计划,旨在提高“风险”儿童安全过马路的基本技能和策略。