Douglas C A, Fildes B N, Gibson T J, Boström O, Pintar F A
Monash University Accident Research Centre, Australia.
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2007;51:319-39.
Seat belt interaction with a far-side occupant's shoulder and thorax is critical to governing excursion towards the struck-side of the vehicle in side impact. In this study, occupant-to-belt interaction was simulated using a modified MADYMO human model and finite element belts. Quasi-static tests with volunteers and dynamic sled tests with PMHS and WorldSID were used for model validation and comparison. Parameter studies were then undertaken to quantify the effect of impact direction, seat belt geometry and pretension on occupant-to-seat belt interaction. Results suggest that lowering the D-ring and increasing pretension reduces the likelihood of the belt slipping off the shoulder. Anthropometry was also shown to influence restraint provided by the shoulder belt. Furthermore, the belt may slip off the occupant's shoulder at impact angles greater than 40 degrees from frontal when no pretension is used. However, the addition of pretension allowed the shoulder to engage the belt in all impacts from 30 to 90 degrees.
安全带与远侧乘客肩部和胸部的相互作用对于控制侧面碰撞时向车辆撞击侧的偏移至关重要。在本研究中,使用改进的MADYMO人体模型和有限元安全带模拟了乘客与安全带的相互作用。使用志愿者进行的准静态试验以及使用PMHS和WorldSID进行的动态雪橇试验用于模型验证和比较。然后进行参数研究,以量化撞击方向、安全带几何形状和预紧力对乘客与安全带相互作用的影响。结果表明,降低D形环并增加预紧力可降低安全带从肩部滑落的可能性。人体测量学也显示会影响肩带提供的约束。此外,当不使用预紧力时,在与正面成大于40度的撞击角度下,安全带可能会从乘客肩部滑落。然而,增加预紧力可使肩部在3个月至90度的所有撞击中都能与安全带接触。
(注:原文中“3个月至90度”可能有误,推测为“30至90度”,已按推测翻译。)