Plamper E, Meinhardt M
Klinikum der Universität zu Köln, BRD.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2008 Jan;51(1):81-8. doi: 10.1007/s00103-008-0422-z.
Since 2004 patient advocates have taken part in counseling on the service catalogue in the Federal Joint Committee and since 2005 on quality assurance of hospital care in the Federal Office of Quality Assurance. The current study provides a first overview on the assessment of patient advocates with their contributions and influence on decisions and the satisfaction of their participation in the committees and boards of the self-governing bodies. There is evidence for necessary improvement both in the preparation for the function as a patient advocate as well as in the transparency of the decision-making in the Federal Joint Committee. The influence of patient advocates on decision-making is regarded as minor. The majority of the patient advocates registered for the Federal Office of Quality Assurance regard their participation as having little influence on the results in the expert committees despite the good possibilities of participation, the high acceptance and great satisfaction with the contribution. There is a vast interest for further on-the-job training. One can assume that further political reforms will result in changing the participation of patient advocates in the self-governing bodies. Therefore far reaching and continuous research to follow the further development of processes and results of participation is recommended.
自2004年以来,患者权益倡导者参与了联邦联合委员会服务目录的咨询工作,自2005年起参与了联邦质量保证办公室医院护理质量保证工作。当前的研究首次概述了对患者权益倡导者的评估,包括他们的贡献、对决策的影响以及他们对参与自治机构委员会和董事会的满意度。有证据表明,在患者权益倡导者职能的准备工作以及联邦联合委员会决策的透明度方面都有必要改进。患者权益倡导者对决策的影响被认为较小。尽管参与机会良好、认可度高且对贡献非常满意,但为联邦质量保证办公室注册的大多数患者权益倡导者认为他们的参与对专家委员会的结果影响不大。对进一步在职培训有着浓厚兴趣。可以设想,进一步的政治改革将导致患者权益倡导者在自治机构中的参与情况发生变化。因此,建议进行深入且持续的研究,以跟踪参与过程和结果的进一步发展。