Crisafulli Michele A, Von Holle Ann, Bulik Cynthia M
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Int J Eat Disord. 2008 May;41(4):333-9. doi: 10.1002/eat.20507.
We examined experimentally the way in which exposure to a sociocultural versus a biological/genetic explanation of the etiology of anorexia nervosa (AN) differentially affected attitudes towards AN.
Undergraduate nursing students were randomly assigned to read information emphasizing either biological/genetic or sociocultural factors in the development of AN. They then completed a series of questionnaires assessing their attitudes towards individuals with AN. Nonparametric tests were used to evaluate attitudinal differences between groups.
Those who were exposed to a biological/genetic explanation of the causes of AN tended to blame individuals with AN less than those exposed to a sociocultural explanation, although all results were not robust to correction for multiple comparisons.
If these results are replicated in larger, population-based samples, wider dissemination of information regarding the biological and genetic underpinnings of AN should be considered as a possible pathway in decreasing the blame-based stigma associated with AN.
我们通过实验研究了接触神经性厌食症(AN)病因的社会文化解释与生物/遗传解释对AN态度的不同影响方式。
本科护理专业学生被随机分配阅读强调AN发展中生物/遗传或社会文化因素的信息。然后他们完成了一系列问卷,评估他们对AN患者的态度。使用非参数检验评估组间态度差异。
接触AN病因的生物/遗传解释的人比接触社会文化解释的人更不容易责怪AN患者,尽管所有结果在多重比较校正后并不稳健。
如果这些结果在更大的基于人群的样本中得到重复,那么应考虑更广泛地传播有关AN生物和遗传基础的信息,作为减少与AN相关的基于责备的耻辱感的可能途径。