Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍与复发性抑郁症相比,抑郁症在ICD - 10诊断亚型上的差异。

Differences in the ICD-10 diagnostic subtype of depression in bipolar disorder compared to recurrent depressive disorder.

作者信息

Kessing Lars Vedel, Jensen Hans Mørch, Christensen Ellen Margrethe

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Psychopathology. 2008;41(3):141-6. doi: 10.1159/000113006. Epub 2008 Jan 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to investigate whether patients with bipolar depression and patients with recurrent depressive disorder present with different subtypes of depressive episode as according to ICD-10.

SAMPLING AND METHODS

All patients who got a diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder, current episode of depression, or a diagnosis of recurrent depressive disorder, current episode of depression, in a period from 1994 to 2002 at the first outpatient treatment or at the first discharge from psychiatric hospitalization in Denmark were identified in a nationwide register.

RESULTS

Totally, 389 patients got a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, current episode of depression, and 5.391 patients got a diagnosis of recurrent depressive disorder, current episode of depression, at first contact. Compared with patients with a diagnosis of recurrent depressive disorder, patients with bipolar disorder, current episode of depression, were significantly less often outpatients (49.4 vs. 68.0%), significantly more often got a diagnosis of severe depression (42.7 vs. 23.3%) or a diagnosis of depression with psychotic symptoms (14.9 vs. 7.2%). The rate of subsequent hospitalization was increased for patients with bipolar disorder, current episode of depression, compared with patients with a current depression as part of a recurrent depressive disorder (HR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.20-1.86).

CONCLUSIONS

The results consistently indicate that a depressive episode is severer and/or more often associated with psychotic symptoms when it occurs as part of a bipolar disorder than as part of a recurrent depressive disorder.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是调查双相抑郁患者和复发性抑郁障碍患者是否根据国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)呈现出不同的抑郁发作亚型。

抽样与方法

在丹麦,从1994年至2002年期间,在首次门诊治疗或首次从精神病院出院时被诊断为双相情感障碍、当前抑郁发作,或复发性抑郁障碍、当前抑郁发作的所有患者,通过全国性登记册进行识别。

结果

总共,389例患者被诊断为双相情感障碍、当前抑郁发作,5391例患者在首次就诊时被诊断为复发性抑郁障碍、当前抑郁发作。与复发性抑郁障碍诊断患者相比,双相情感障碍、当前抑郁发作患者作为门诊患者的比例显著更低(49.4%对68.0%),被诊断为重度抑郁(42.7%对23.3%)或伴有精神病性症状的抑郁(14.9%对7.2%)的比例显著更高。与作为复发性抑郁障碍一部分的当前抑郁患者相比,双相情感障碍、当前抑郁发作患者随后住院的比例有所增加(风险比[HR]=1.50,95%置信区间[CI]=1.20 - 1.86)。

结论

结果一致表明,当抑郁发作作为双相情感障碍的一部分出现时,比作为复发性抑郁障碍的一部分出现时更严重和/或更常伴有精神病性症状。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验