Visser L E, Kyei-Faried S, Belcher D W, Geelhoed D W, van Leeuwen J Schagen, van Roosmalen J
Mathias Hospital, P.O. Box 43, Yeji B/A, Ghana.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008 May;102(5):445-50. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.11.006. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
This study compares two antivenoms used to treat Echis ocellatus snake bite patients at Mathias Hospital, Yeji, central Ghana. FAV-Afrique antivenom (Aventis Pasteur) was given to 278 patients during 2001--2003, whilst Asna Antivenom C (Bharat Serum and Vaccines Ltd) was used in 2004 to treat 66 patients. The two groups had comparable patient attributes, time from snake bite to treatment and staff adherence to the tested treatment protocol. The antivenom C group required more repeat doses and twice the amount of antivenom to treat coagulopathy. Of greater concern, the antivenom C mortality rate was 12.1%, a marked rise from the 1.8% rate in the earlier FAV-Afrique antivenom group. In this study, antivenom C was ineffective as treatment for West African E. ocellatus snake venom. This illustrates the absolute need for regional pilot tests to assess the effectiveness of a new antivenom against local snake venoms before its sole and general distribution in a region is initiated.
本研究比较了在加纳中部叶吉市马蒂亚斯医院用于治疗锯鳞蝰蛇咬伤患者的两种抗蛇毒血清。2001年至2003年期间,278名患者使用了FAV-Afrique抗蛇毒血清(赛诺菲巴斯德公司),而2004年使用阿斯纳抗蛇毒血清C(巴拉特血清和疫苗有限公司)治疗了66名患者。两组患者的特征、从蛇咬伤到治疗的时间以及工作人员对测试治疗方案的依从性具有可比性。抗蛇毒血清C组治疗凝血病需要更多的重复剂量,且抗蛇毒血清用量是FAV-Afrique抗蛇毒血清组的两倍。更令人担忧的是,抗蛇毒血清C组的死亡率为12.1%,较早期FAV-Afrique抗蛇毒血清组的1.8%显著上升。在本研究中,抗蛇毒血清C作为治疗西非锯鳞蝰蛇毒的药物无效。这表明在一个地区开始独家和广泛分发新抗蛇毒血清之前,绝对需要进行区域试点测试,以评估其对当地蛇毒的有效性。