Holderegger Claudia, Sailer Irena, Schuhmacher Caroline, Schläpfer Ragna, Hämmerle Christoph, Fischer Jens
Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
Dent Mater. 2008 Jul;24(7):944-50. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.021. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
The objectives of this in vitro study were (1) to assess the bond strength of the universal cement RelyX Unicem to dentin and to compare it with three conventional resin cements, (2) to test the influence of aging on their bonding capacity and (3) to test the influence of the operator on bonding quality by performing the same test in two different centers.
160 third molars, divided into 80 for tests at the University of Zurich (Z) and 80 for tests at the University of Berne (B), were assigned to 2 x 8 subgroups of 10 teeth each. The specimens were prepared with the corresponding bonding agents and acrylic rods were luted either with RelyX Unicem (U), RelyX ARC (A), Multilink (M) or Panavia 21 (P). All specimens were stored in water for 24h (W) and half of the specimens were subjected to 1500 cycles of thermocycling (5 degrees C and 55 degrees C) (T). Bond strength was measured by means of a shear test.
After water storage RelyX Unicem exhibited lowest bond strength (UWZ: 9.2+/-1.6 MPa, UWB: 9.9+/-1.2 MPa, AWZ: 15.3+/-6.0 MPa, AWB: 12.2+/-4.3 MPa, MWZ: 15.6+/-3.3 MPa, MWB: 12.4 MPa+/-2.4, PWZ: 13.4+/-2.9 MPa, PWB: 14.9+/-2.6 MPa). Thermocycling affected the bonding performance of all four cements. However, bond strength of RelyX Unicem was least influenced by thermocycling (UTZ: 9.4+/-2.9 MPa, UTB: 8.6+/-1.3 MPa, ATZ: 11.4+/-6.3 MPa, ATB: 13.3+/-3.7 MPa, MTZ: 15.4+/-3.1 MPa, MTB: 10.3+/-2.4 MPa, PTZ: 11.1+/-2.8 MPa, PTB: 11.3+/-2.8 MPa).
Although the bond strength of RelyX Unicem to dentin was lower in comparison to RelyX ARC, Multilink and Panavia 21, its bond strength was less sensitive to variations in handling and aging.
本体外研究的目的是:(1)评估通用型粘结剂RelyX Unicem与牙本质的粘结强度,并将其与三种传统树脂粘结剂进行比较;(2)测试老化对其粘结能力的影响;(3)通过在两个不同中心进行相同测试,检验操作人员对粘结质量的影响。
160颗第三磨牙,分为80颗在苏黎世大学(Z)进行测试,80颗在伯尔尼大学(B)进行测试,再分为2×8个亚组,每组各10颗牙。用相应的粘结剂制备样本,并用RelyX Unicem(U)、RelyX ARC(A)、Multilink(M)或Panavia 21(P)粘结丙烯酸棒。所有样本在水中储存24小时(W),其中一半样本进行1500次热循环(5℃和55℃)(T)。通过剪切试验测量粘结强度。
储存于水中后,RelyX Unicem表现出最低的粘结强度(UWZ:9.2±1.6MPa,UWB:9.9±1.2MPa,AWZ:15.3±6.0MPa,AWB:12.2±4.3MPa,MWZ:15.6±3.3MPa,MWB:12.4MPa±2.4,PWZ:13.4±2.9MPa,PWB:14.9±2.6MPa)。热循环影响了所有四种粘结剂的粘结性能。然而,RelyX Unicem的粘结强度受热循环的影响最小(UTZ:9.4±2.9MPa,UTB:8.6±1.3MPa,ATZ:11.4±6.3MPa,ATB:13.3±3.7MPa,MTZ:15.4±3.1MPa,MTB:10.3±2.4MPa,PTZ:11.1±2.8MPa,PTB:11.