Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodonticsand Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Oper Dent. 2011 Sep-Oct;36(5):492-501. doi: 10.2341/10-292-L. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
This study tested the impact of Gluma Desensitizer on the shear bond strength (SBS) of two conventional (RelyX ARC, Panavia 21) and two self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem, G-Cem) resin luting cements after water storage and thermocycling. Human third molars (N=880) were embedded in acrylic resin. The buccal dentin was exposed. Teeth were randomly divided into four main groups, and the following cements were adhered: 1) RelyX ARC, 2) Panavia 21, 3) RelyX Unicem, and 4) G-Cem. In half of the teeth in each group, dentin was treated with Gluma Desensitizer. In the conventional cement groups, the corresponding etchant and adhesive systems were applied. SBS of the cements was tested after 1 hour (initial); at 1, 4, 9, 16, and 25 days of water storage; and at 1, 4, 9, 16, and 25 days of thermocycling. SBS data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); this was followed by the post hoc Scheffé test and a t-test. Overall, the highest mean SBS (MPa) was obtained by RelyX ARC (ranging from 14.6 ± 3.9 to 17.6 ± 5.2) and the lowest by Panavia 21 in combination with Gluma Desensitizer (ranging from 0.0 to 2.9 ± 1.0). All tested groups with and without desensitizer showed no significant decrease after aging conditions compared with baseline values (p>0.05). Only the Panavia 21/Gluma Desensitizer combination showed a significant decrease after 4 days of thermocyling compared with initial values and 1 day thermocycling. Self-adhesive cements with Gluma Desensitizer showed increased SBS after aging conditions (ranging from 7.4 ± 1.4 to 15.2 ± 3) compared with groups without desensitizer (ranging from 2.6 ± 1.2 to 8.8 ± 2.9). No cohesive failures in dentin were observed in any of the test groups. Although self-adhesive cements with and without desensitizer presented mainly adhesive failures after water storage (95.8%) and thermocyling (100%), conventional cement (RelyX ARC) showed mainly mixed failures (90.8% and 89.2%, after water storage and thermocyling, respectively). Application of the Gluma Desensitizer to dentin before cementation had a positive effect on the SBS of self-adhesive cements.
本研究测试了在水储存和热循环后,Gluma 脱敏剂对两种传统(RelyX ARC、Panavia 21)和两种自粘(RelyX Unicem、G-Cem)树脂水门汀的剪切结合强度(SBS)的影响。将人类第三磨牙(N=880)嵌入丙烯酸树脂中。暴露颊侧牙本质。将牙齿随机分为四组,分别粘固以下水门汀:1)RelyX ARC,2)Panavia 21,3)RelyX Unicem,和 4)G-Cem。在每组的一半牙齿中,牙本质用 Gluma 脱敏剂处理。在传统水门汀组中,应用相应的蚀刻剂和粘合剂系统。在水储存 1 小时(初始)、1、4、9、16 和 25 天以及热循环 1、4、9、16 和 25 天后,测试水门汀的 SBS。SBS 数据采用单向方差分析(ANOVA)进行分析;随后进行事后 Scheffé 检验和 t 检验。总体而言,RelyX ARC 获得的平均 SBS(MPa)最高(范围为 14.6±3.9 至 17.6±5.2),而与 Gluma 脱敏剂联合使用的 Panavia 21 最低(范围为 0.0 至 2.9±1.0)。与基线值相比,所有经过老化条件测试的组(有或没有脱敏剂)均无显著下降(p>0.05)。仅 Panavia 21/Gluma Desensitizer 组合在热循环 4 天后与初始值和 1 天热循环相比显示出显著下降。用 Gluma 脱敏剂处理的自粘水门汀在老化条件下显示出更高的 SBS(范围为 7.4±1.4 至 15.2±3),而未经脱敏剂处理的组则显示出更高的 SBS(范围为 2.6±1.2 至 8.8±2.9)。在任何测试组中都没有观察到牙本质的内聚性失效。尽管在用和不用脱敏剂的自粘水门汀中,水储存(95.8%)和热循环(100%)后主要发生粘接力失效,但传统水门汀(RelyX ARC)主要表现为混合失效(水储存和热循环后分别为 90.8%和 89.2%)。在粘固前将 Gluma 脱敏剂应用于牙本质对自粘水门汀的 SBS 有积极影响。