• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于经济评估在地方决策中应用的系统评价。

A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decision-making.

作者信息

Eddama Oya, Coast Joanna

机构信息

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2008 May;86(2-3):129-41. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.11.010. Epub 2008 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.11.010
PMID:18192059
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In view of resource scarcity, decisions have to be made on the optimal allocation of resources and one possible option in health care is economic evaluation. Little is known, however, about the use of economic evaluation. The objectives of this review were to assimilate the empirical evidence on this topic, discuss the main findings, and explore the possible need for further work needed in this area.

METHODS

A total of 40 studies were included in the review from a range of countries. A systematic search strategy was used and data from papers were extracted in a systematic way.

RESULTS

Pharmacists and clinicians in the US are the most frequently sampled group and postal surveys was the most commonly used method. Despite some positive findings, in most cases there appear to be obstacles to the extensive use of economic evaluation in decision-making. Obstacles can be linked to three factors: (1) institutional and political; (2) cultural; (3) methodological factors associated with economic evaluation itself.

CONCLUSION

There has clearly been an increase in the use of economic evaluation over time, especially in the UK, whereas the US appears to have a deep rooted disfavour of the approach. However, there is still little known about the exact influence of economic evaluation at the local level. Whilst work conducted to date has been valuable in providing information about use and barriers to use, further qualitative work is needed to enrich and explain some of the findings from this review.

摘要

目标

鉴于资源稀缺,必须对资源的最优分配做出决策,而卫生保健领域的一个可能选择是经济评估。然而,对于经济评估的使用情况却知之甚少。本综述的目的是收集关于该主题的实证证据,讨论主要发现,并探讨该领域可能需要进一步开展的工作。

方法

该综述纳入了来自一系列国家的40项研究。采用了系统的检索策略,并以系统的方式提取了论文中的数据。

结果

美国的药剂师和临床医生是最常被抽样的群体,邮寄调查是最常用的方法。尽管有一些积极的发现,但在大多数情况下,经济评估在决策中广泛应用似乎存在障碍。障碍可与三个因素相关:(1)制度和政治因素;(2)文化因素;(3)与经济评估本身相关的方法学因素。

结论

随着时间的推移,经济评估的使用显然有所增加,尤其是在英国,而美国似乎对这种方法根深蒂固地不感兴趣。然而,对于经济评估在地方层面的确切影响仍知之甚少。虽然迄今为止开展的工作在提供关于使用情况和使用障碍的信息方面很有价值,但仍需要进一步的定性研究来丰富和解释本综述的一些发现。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decision-making.关于经济评估在地方决策中应用的系统评价。
Health Policy. 2008 May;86(2-3):129-41. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.11.010. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
A systematic review and economic evaluation of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha in anaemia associated with cancer, especially that attributable to cancer treatment.促红细胞生成素α、促红细胞生成素β和达比加群酯治疗癌症相关性贫血(尤其是癌症治疗所致贫血)的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Apr;11(13):1-202, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11130.
8
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
9
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
10
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical decision-making process and distributive justice: The mediating role of economic analysis. Empirical evidence from Italy.临床决策过程与分配正义:经济分析的中介作用。来自意大利的实证证据。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Mar;31(2):e14119. doi: 10.1111/jep.14119. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
2
Development of the Indian Reference Case for undertaking economic evaluation for health technology assessment.用于卫生技术评估的印度参考案例的制定。
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Jun 17;16:100241. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100241. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
A decision support tool with health economic modelling for better management of DVT patients.
一种具有健康经济模型的决策支持工具,用于更好地管理深静脉血栓形成患者。
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Dec 26;12(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00412-9.
4
Economic Evaluation Evidence for Resource-Allocation Decision Making: Bridging the Gap for Local Decision Makers Using English Case Studies.经济评估证据在资源配置决策中的应用:使用英文案例研究缩小地方决策者之间的差距。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Nov;20(6):783-792. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00756-7. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
5
Identifying Options of Best Value: Use of Economic Evaluation in Public Health.确定最佳价值选项:公共卫生中经济评估的应用
China CDC Wkly. 2020 Jan 31;2(5):75-78.
6
An Introduction to the Main Types of Economic Evaluations Used for Informing Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare: Key Features, Uses, and Limitations.用于为医疗保健中的优先事项设定和资源分配提供信息的主要类型经济评估简介:主要特点、用途和局限性。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;9:722927. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.722927. eCollection 2021.
7
Health Technology Assessment Development in Vietnam: A Qualitative Study of Current Progress, Barriers, Facilitators, and Future Strategies.越南卫生技术评估发展:当前进展、障碍、促进因素和未来战略的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 22;18(16):8846. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168846.
8
Interpretation of trial-based economic evaluations of musculoskeletal physical therapy interventions.解读肌肉骨骼物理治疗干预的基于试验的经济评估。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Sep-Oct;25(5):514-529. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
9
A systematic review of the quality and scope of decision modelling studies in child oral health research.儿童口腔健康研究中决策建模研究的质量与范围的系统评价
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jun 25;21(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01680-3.
10
Comparing Public and Provider Preferences for Setting Healthcare Priorities: Evidence from Kuwait.比较公众与医疗服务提供者在确定医疗保健优先事项上的偏好:来自科威特的证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 May 8;9(5):552. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050552.