Suppr超能文献

通过参与跨学科研究项目反思合作学习:紧张关系与协商作为知识生产的关键点

Rethinking collaborative learning through participation in an interdisciplinary research project: tensions and negotiations as key points in knowledge production.

作者信息

Tartas Valérie, Muller Mirza Nathalie

机构信息

Cognition, Communication and Development Laboratory, University of Toulouse 2, France.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Jun;41(2):154-68. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9019-6.

Abstract

As social and cultural psychologists of learning, we are persuaded of the crucial role of interaction in development and learning. But how do we experience this assumption in our own research practices and in our collaboration with colleagues? Taking as our object of study our own participation in a European Research and Development project that aimed to enhance interactive and argumentative skills in learning settings, this study shows how collaboration among project partners is not something that is to be taken for granted, but something that is elaborated and evolves in time, takes diverse forms, and is mediated by multiple tools. The psychological processes--more particularly tensions and negotiation--involved in collaboration are developed and discussed. The study explores the processes of establishing collaboration and, through the analysis of specific zones of tensions, sheds light on the way new knowledge (on how to do research, how to communicate, how to work together) is constructed. It contributes to the understanding of the issues and conditions for the development of a community of practice.

摘要

作为学习领域的社会文化心理学家,我们深信互动在发展和学习中起着至关重要的作用。但我们如何在自己的研究实践以及与同事的合作中践行这一假设呢?本研究以我们自身参与的一个欧洲研发项目为研究对象,该项目旨在提高学习环境中的互动和论证技能。研究表明,项目合作伙伴之间的协作并非理所当然之事,而是一个随着时间推移不断细化和演变、形式多样且由多种工具介导的过程。我们对协作过程中涉及的心理过程,尤其是紧张关系和协商进行了深入探讨。本研究探索了建立协作的过程,并通过对特定紧张区域的分析,揭示了新知识(关于如何进行研究、如何沟通、如何合作)的构建方式。它有助于理解实践共同体发展的问题和条件。

相似文献

3
On the conditions for generative collaboration: learning through collaborative research.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Jun;41(2):178-86. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9017-8.
4
Reflective sociocultural psychology: lost and found in collaboration with funding agencies and ICT experts.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Jun;41(2):169-77. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9018-7.
5
East-West European project: transforming and shaping research through collaboration.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Jun;41(2):124-38. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9014-y.
6
International collaboration as construction of knowledge and its constraints.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Jun;41(2):187-97. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9022-y.
7
Sometimes one is more than two: when collaboration inhibits knowledge construction.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Jun;41(2):198-207. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9015-x.
8
An application of an effective interdisciplinary health-focused cross-cultural collaboration.
J Prof Nurs. 2001 Jan-Feb;17(1):33-9. doi: 10.1053/jpnu.2001.20244.
9
Collaborative research, knowledge and emergence.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Jun;41(2):208-17. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9021-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating psychology within the globalizing world: a requiem to the post-modernist experiment with Wissenschaft.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2009 Mar;43(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s12124-009-9087-x. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
2
Collaborative research, knowledge and emergence.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Jun;41(2):208-17. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9021-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness.
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Feb;87(1):3-13. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验