Fisher Mary Alice
The Center for Ethical Practice, Inc., Charlottesville, VA 22902, USA.
Am Psychol. 2008 Jan;63(1):1-13. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.1.1.
All psychologists must uphold the same ethical standards about confidentiality even though each state imposes different legal limits on their ability to protect clients' confidences. The resulting ethical-legal confusion is exacerbated by legally based confidentiality training that treats legal exceptions as if they were the rule and fosters the impression that attorneys are now the only real experts about this aspect of practice. This article provides an ethics-based confidentiality practice model that clarifies the ethical rule and puts its legal exceptions into ethical perspective. Like the Confidentiality section of the American Psychological Association's (2002) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, this outline would apply to all psychologists regardless of state laws, but the details of its implementation would vary according to role and setting. It can be used as a universal training outline, a consultation and supervision tool, a guide to professional practice, and a basis for clearer ongoing conversation about the ethics of "conditional confidentiality." Psychologists can use this practice model to regain their status as experts about the confidentiality ethics of their own profession.
所有心理学家都必须秉持相同的保密道德标准,尽管每个州对他们保护客户隐私的能力规定了不同的法律限制。基于法律的保密培训将法律例外情况当作常规来对待,并让人觉得律师是这方面实践的唯一真正专家,这加剧了由此产生的道德与法律之间的混乱。本文提供了一个基于道德的保密实践模式,该模式阐明了道德准则,并从道德角度审视其法律例外情况。与美国心理学会(2002年)《心理学家道德原则与行为准则》中的保密部分一样,本大纲适用于所有心理学家,无论州法律如何,但具体实施细节会因角色和环境而异。它可用作通用培训大纲、咨询与监督工具、专业实践指南,以及就“有条件保密”的道德问题进行更清晰持续对话的基础。心理学家可以使用这个实践模式来重新确立自己作为本专业保密道德专家的地位。