• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁送了什么:皮肤科医生、病理学家和皮肤病理学家转诊的皮肤病理学病例比较

Who sends what: a comparison of dermatopathology referrals from dermatologists, pathologists and dermatopathologists.

作者信息

Goldenberg Gary, Camacho Fabian, Gildea Jacob, Golitz Loren E

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

J Cutan Pathol. 2008 Jul;35(7):658-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2007.00869.x. Epub 2008 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0560.2007.00869.x
PMID:18201232
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dermatopathologists, dermatologists and pathologists interpret skin pathology specimens.

OBJECTIVE

To examine dermatopathology referral patterns of dermatologists, pathologists and dermatopathologists.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed diagnoses rendered by one dermatopathologist to 916 primary interpretation cases (543 from university dermatologists and 373 from private practice dermatologists) and 517 consultations (450 from dermatologists, 52 from pathologists and 15 from dermatopathologists). Each diagnosis was assigned into one of six categories. Chi-square tests were used to compare referral types pairwise and correspondence analysis was performed.

RESULTS

All profile comparisons tested significantly from each other (p-value < 0.01) except the comparison between dermatopathologists and pathologists. Correspondence analysis suggested that consultation profile of dermatopathologists was most dissimilar from other profiles and tended to associate more with the presence of malignant and benign melanocytic referral types. Referral pattern of pathologists was more similar to that of dermatologists who interpret skin pathology specimens than that of dermatopathologists.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size, referral bias, difficulty classifying certain lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Referral pattern of dermatopathologists was most dissimilar from other profiles and tended to associate more with malignant and benign melanocytic referral types. Referral pattern of pathologists was more similar to that of dermatologists who interpret skin pathology specimens than that of dermatopathologists.

摘要

背景

皮肤病理学家、皮肤科医生和病理学家解读皮肤病理标本。

目的

研究皮肤科医生、病理学家和皮肤病理学家的皮肤病理转诊模式。

方法

我们回顾性分析了一位皮肤病理学家对916例初次解读病例(543例来自大学皮肤科医生,373例来自私人执业皮肤科医生)和517例会诊病例(450例来自皮肤科医生,52例来自病理学家,15例来自皮肤病理学家)做出的诊断。每个诊断被归入六个类别之一。采用卡方检验对转诊类型进行两两比较,并进行对应分析。

结果

除皮肤病理学家和病理学家之间的比较外,所有特征比较相互之间均有显著差异(p值<0.01)。对应分析表明,皮肤病理学家的会诊特征与其他特征最不相似,并且往往与恶性和良性黑素细胞转诊类型的存在更多相关。病理学家的转诊模式与解读皮肤病理标本的皮肤科医生的转诊模式比与皮肤病理学家的转诊模式更相似。

局限性

样本量小、转诊偏倚、某些病变分类困难。

结论

皮肤病理学家的转诊模式与其他特征最不相似,并且往往与恶性和良性黑素细胞转诊类型的存在更多相关。病理学家的转诊模式与解读皮肤病理标本的皮肤科医生的转诊模式比与皮肤病理学家的转诊模式更相似。

相似文献

1
Who sends what: a comparison of dermatopathology referrals from dermatologists, pathologists and dermatopathologists.谁送了什么:皮肤科医生、病理学家和皮肤病理学家转诊的皮肤病理学病例比较
J Cutan Pathol. 2008 Jul;35(7):658-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2007.00869.x. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
2
Assessing comfort level with pediatric skin specimens among dermatopathologists and pediatric pathologists: A national cross-sectional survey.评估皮肤科病理学家和儿科病理学家对儿科皮肤标本的舒适度:一项全国性横断面调查。
J Cutan Pathol. 2021 Sep;48(9):1109-1114. doi: 10.1111/cup.13997. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
3
Discrepancies in dermatopathology diagnoses: the role of second review policies and dermatopathology fellowship training.皮肤科病理学诊断中的差异:二次审核政策和皮肤科病理住院医师培训的作用。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Jan;68(1):119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.06.034. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
4
[Pseudolymphoma of the skin: ambiguous terminology: a survey among dermatologists and pathologists].[皮肤假性淋巴瘤:术语不明确:皮肤科医生和病理学家的一项调查]
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Feb;140(2):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.annder.2012.10.600. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
5
How informative are dermatopathology requisition forms completed by dermatologists? A review of the clinical information provided for 100 consecutive melanocytic lesions.皮肤科医师填写的皮肤科病理申请单信息量如何?对 100 例连续黑素细胞病变提供的临床信息进行的回顾性研究。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Feb;62(2):257-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.049. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
6
Assessment of Second-Opinion Strategies for Diagnoses of Cutaneous Melanocytic Lesions.评估皮肤黑素细胞病变诊断的第二诊疗意见策略。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912597. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12597.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy of Virtual Pathology vs Traditional Microscopy in a Large Dermatopathology Study.虚拟病理学与传统显微镜检查在大型皮肤病理学研究中的诊断准确性。
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Dec 1;153(12):1285-1291. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3284.
8
How concerns and experiences with medical malpractice affect dermatopathologists' perceptions of their diagnostic practices when interpreting cutaneous melanocytic lesions.医疗事故方面的担忧和经历如何影响皮肤病理学家在解读皮肤黑素细胞性病变时对其诊断实践的认知。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Feb;74(2):317-24; quiz 324.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.037. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
9
Interpretation of dermatopathology specimens is within the standard of care of dermatology practice.皮肤病理学标本的解读属于皮肤科诊疗的标准范畴。
Dermatol Surg. 2005 Mar;31(3):306-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31079.
10
Dermatopathologists' Experience With and Perceptions of Patient Online Access to Pathologic Test Result Reports.皮肤科病理学家对患者在线获取病理检验结果报告的体验和看法。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Mar 1;156(3):320-324. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4194.

引用本文的文献

1
Dermatologic Lesions Submitted to an Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Biopsy Service: An Analysis of 2487 Cases.提交至口腔颌面病理活检服务的皮肤病变:2487例病例分析
Head Neck Pathol. 2018 Dec;12(4):493-499. doi: 10.1007/s12105-018-0885-7. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
2
Pathologists' Use of Second Opinions in Interpretation of Melanocytic Cutaneous Lesions: Policies, Practices, and Perceptions.病理学家在皮肤黑素细胞性病变诊断中使用二次诊断意见的情况:政策、实践与认知
Dermatol Surg. 2018 Feb;44(2):177-185. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001256.